Showing posts with label voter suppression. Show all posts
Showing posts with label voter suppression. Show all posts

2014-03-24

On the Road to Darkness: Thoughts on the Fascist Disease Infecting Western Society


Most people who live in Western democracies believe that we live in societies that value freedom, liberty and tolerance – principles and values that were purchased with human blood (during World War II) and at an immense cost to the national treasuries of most Western democracies (during both World War II and the Cold War).  In the former conflict Allied soldiers fought against nations whose leaders were committed to political ideologies that plunged the world into madness and resulted in the death of more than 63 million people (a number slightly less than the current population of the United Kingdom).

The architects of those ideologies and the war they instigated died almost seven decades ago.  However, people who believe in many aspects of those ideologies, and want to see governments based on them, continue to exist and have managed to influence politics in many Western democracies, particularly over the past two decades.  The ideology to which I refer is fascism – a word that comes with all kinds of historical baggage, a word that most people are unlikely to use when referring to some present-day Western leaders and politicians.  But despite the reticence of the mainstream media or political commentators to use that term, the truth is that many of the policies being implemented by governments, in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom and other Western democracies have their roots in an ideology that millions shed their blood to defeat.

Present day fascism is an ideology that comes in many forms, an ideology where one size does not fit all. It manifests itself in The West by the actions of political, financial and corporate elites who desire to maintain and grow the existing infrastructure of wealth and power that favours their interests – that is, preserve the existing hierarchical and imbalanced socio-economic culture using the tools built into the globalized, corporation dominated economic order that has developed over the past 20 years.

The classical definition of fascism revolves around a joining of government and private corporations to exploit all available resources in pursuit of private profit, regardless of whether that profit is achieved by the exploitation and suffering of the vast majority of society, or even if it undermines the democratic underpinnings of that society.

The fascism of the 20th Century was a reactionary ideology primarily in response to the advance of communism, and it was expressed through the following characteristics:
  • protection and enhancement of the power of industrial / corporate elites;
  • control of the mass media;
  • rampant cronyism and political corruption;
  • election fraud and voter manipulation / suppression;
  • contempt for decisions and policies based on sound research;
  • identifying and targeting so-called “enemies” or scapegoating as a unifying cause;
  • fixation on national security, crime and punishment, and "order" in society; 
  • political rhetoric emphasizing and elevating the place of police and the military in society;
  • historical revisionism;
  • disdain for civil liberties, human rights and social justice;
  • suppression of and attacks on legal political dissent and political opponents;
  • tolerance for sexism and misogyny;
  • support and advancement of ethnic and / or cultural nationalism; and
  • attacks on and suppression of organized labour.
If we examine the way that governments in most Western democracies, through their policies and actions, have evolved during the past two decades then we would see that many if not all of the characteristics that define fascism are present in the political cultures of The West.

If the allied soldiers who gave their lives for democracy, free speech, human rights and the other things that define a truly free and democratic society were alive today they would be appalled at what has transpired.  Because what has happened is the creation of a political culture and societal attitude, shaped by governments and corporations following a neo-liberal / neo-conservative ideology, which has copied many aspects of the fascist ideology that Allied nations fought against in World War II, and the authoritarian ideology they continued to fight during the Cold War with the Soviet Union.  And while what exists in western democracies lacks many of the more horrific and ethno-nationalist aspects of 20th Century fascism, in many of its major characteristics the political culture that has evolved in The West is proto-fascist if not actually fascist.


This is has not gone unobserved by journalists, academics and political pundits.  It is something that has been noted by Canadian pollster and political commentator Allan Gregg among others.  In a speech given on September 5, 2012 at Carleton University he compared what has happened to politics in Canada under Prime Minister Stephen Harper to the dystopian George Orwell novel Nineteen Eighty-Four – an analysis that is noteworthy because of Gregg’s historical connections to the predecessor of the Conservative Party of Canada.  While the world we live in may not mirror what Orwell described in his novel, there are disturbing parallels between what is happening to politics and the democratic process in Canada and elements of Orwell’s novel.

In his remarks Gregg outlined the various policy changes that Harper has implemented at the federal level.  By presenting the facts Gregg asks his audience to put together the pieces of the puzzle and conclude for themselves that Canada is well down the road to fascism courtesy of the Harper government.  He then observes that despite how Canada has been transformed during Harper’s tenure as prime minister, there is no hue and cry from Canadians in protest.  And yet there is much that Canadians and citizens of Western democracies should be protesting.

Another critic of the fascist political culture that has evolved in The West over the past two decades is Prof. Henry Giroux, Global Television Network Chair in English and Cultural Studies at McMaster University.  In many of his writings Giroux provides analysis and insight into the state of modern society / culture in the U.S. and asks U.S. citizens to do what is necessary to challenge a culture and political mindset where the views of the majority of citizens / voters are relegated to the bottom of the list of interests that politicians cater to while the interests of corporations and elites are addressed with little thought as to the harmful effects they may have on society at large.

In a recent article, Intellectualism in the Age of Mass Surveillance, Giroux states that “[corporate] media are mostly engaged in what Noam Chomsky called ‘manufactured consent’, producing spectacles of [inanity and] violence, and pushing celebrity culture that becomes the ultimate model of a [debilitating] mode of consumption.  He goes on to say that “loyalty to fame, money, and authority is far more important than the truth, a sense of social responsibility, or a passion and commitment to a more just world.”

Through their commentary People like Gregg, Giroux, Chomsky and others are trying to open the eyes of the masses, trying to raise awareness that we are living in a time where those who have the courage to hold authority accountable are treated like criminals or terrorists (i.e. Edward Snowden, Julian Assange, Bradley Manning) while those who use the power and authority of the state and mega corporations to commit horrendous crimes are treated as patriots and held up as models of leadership.

Giroux’s articles and critiques, as well as those of Allan Gregg, Noam Chomsky and others like them, should be heeded and used as inspirations for the changes that must be implemented if The West’s political culture (and by extension Western society) is to be prevented from stepping into an era of political and social darkness.

Please note that all links in this article were current and working at the time of posting.  If any links no longer work please post a note in the comments section and I will post a link that works.
~ Fareed Khan

Related Articles & Links: 


© F. Khan.  All Rights Reserved.












2013-07-29

The Fallacy of Freedom and Democracy in America

July 29, 2013 -- In the United States -- land of "freedom", "democracy" and "free" speech -- the values that American politicians like to brag about are under assault.  Since the 9/11 terrorist attacks US politicians have implemented what many academics, journalists and civil libertarians have labelled as a "surveillance state" or "national security state" -- labels that the US and its western allies applied to the Soviet Union during the Cold War.  It was something they claimed would happen to the West if the Soviets were able to impose their world view on us.

We learned a couple of months ago via whistle blower Edward Snowden that the US government has been spying on the phone calls and Internet habits of hundreds of millions of innocent Americans (along with those of foreigners communicating with Americans) for years.  By revealing that information to a journalist Snowden is now on the US most wanted list for doing what many American patriots have done in the past -- bringing to light violations against Americans by the American government.  Had Daniel Ellsberg leaked the Pentagon Papers today he would be labelled a traitor and been jailed for life rather then have been celebrated as a whistle blower.

The very nature of democracy is under assault in the US as more and more state governments implement voter suppression laws that are aimed at preventing people from casting votes, especially if they happen to be minorities and are likely to vote against the Republicans.  In addition, the defence of democratic principles and institutions has been severely undermined over the last 20 years by the willingness of both Democratic and Republican administrations to permit corporate concentration and control of the news and information infrastructure of a nation, and be cheerleaders for US government policies rather than watchdogs of democracy as has been the case historically.  Defending democracy is the reason why the "press" is the only profession mentioned in the US Constitution.   

Related: Alternative / Independent Media: The answer to democratic decay or just some more voices in the crowd?

And free speech is under assault as journalists are now threatened with charges of espionage and aiding and abetting enemies of America for revealing information about US government violations of civil liberties and US law.  Even expressing political views, which might be offensive to some but are supposedly protected by the US Bill of Rights, may now be considered a criminal act or act of espionage.

In one of the most egregious violations of the constitutional guarantee of free speech ever Tarek Mehanna, an American Muslim, was convicted in April 2012 for translating terrorist documents into English, expressing sympathetic views to what was contained in those documents, and posting them on the Internet.  He was sentenced to 17 years in prison for those actions.  Essentially, his crime was to support the idea of waging war against an invading army perpetrating an aggressive attack on a Muslim nation.  As it happens those invading armies currently happen to be those of the United States which have illegally invaded Muslim nations; violated the civil liberties of the people of those nations, killed thousands of innocent men, women and children of those nations; and justified its actions by claiming that it did so to protect America against terrorists.  What is perverse about this is that Mehanna expressed his views in a nation where every vile and odious idea that one can think of is generally claimed as "free speech" protected under the US Constitution. 

Related: Our One-Sided War on Terror

In this case, and I'm sure in cases to come, it will become clear who the real criminals are.  And it's not the person whose political ideas you disagree with, but the people who have twisted and manipulated US laws and its justice system to imprison anyone who expresses political views that go against orthodoxy or might be considered distasteful.

In doing what he did Mehanna acted in the same manner that American revolutionaries did in the 1770s when they spoke out against the policies of the British colonial government.  Those people, who Americans call the "Founding Fathers", acted upon their ideas in order to oppose the injustice and oppression of Britain in its American colonies and they are celebrated as heroes and freedom fighters for their actions.  However, if they were alive today and spoke out against the oppressive and unjust policies of today's America, they would quickly be labelled traitors and terrorists, and they would be imprisoned for the rest of their lives.

The sooner Americans realize that a political and moral darkness is consuming their country, the sooner that nation can start returning to the light.

© The View From Here.  All Rights Reserved.