Fareed Khan
Toronto Star Contributor
Tue., June 23, 2020
https://www.thestar.com/opinion/contributors/2020/06/23/systemic-racism-on-display-in-house-of-commons.html
Toronto Star Contributor
Tue., June 23, 2020
https://www.thestar.com/opinion/contributors/2020/06/23/systemic-racism-on-display-in-house-of-commons.html
The
latest examples of systemic racism in Canada occurred last week in the heart of
Canada’s democracy. It involved the only racialized leader of a federal
political party, NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh, and how he was treated in the House
of Commons, as well as how the story was covered by the media.
On June
17, House of Commons Speaker Anthony Rota expelled Singh from the House for
refusing to apologize for calling Bloc Québécois MP Alain Therrien racist. The incident occurred after Therrien
became the only MP to vote “no” on Singh’s motion calling on the government to
investigate the issue of systemic racism within the RCMP, their budget and
their training of officers on the use of force. In addition to voting “no” on
the motion, thereby denying it unanimous consent and causing it to fail,
Therrien used a hand gesture that Singh found to be dismissive of the
seriousness of the issue being discussed, which resulted in Singh using the
word he did.
This
incident, and how media covered it, not only showed Canadians an example of
racism played out at the highest level of politics, it also demonstrated that a
racialized minority in a position of privilege was not immune to systemic
racism. For many people of colour across the country, it was another example of
how they are treated when they try and challenge racist behaviour in their own
lives.
The image
of the only political party leader who is a visible minority being thrown out
of Parliament by the white Speaker of the House, for challenging what he
considered racist behaviour by a white MP, was a glaring
example of systemic racism and white privilege at the highest level of
politics. To add insult to injury, the MP who instigated the incident was
allowed to remain in the House of Commons, and was defended by the white
members of his caucus. It was as though Therrien, the Bloc Québécois caucus, and
the Speaker were blind and deaf to the calls of Canadians, particularly Black
and Indigenous Canadians, protesting in the streets and calling for an end
to systemic racism and police violence.
In
addition to Singh’s treatment in the House, another layer of systemic racism
was evident in the way that editors and producers at Canada’s major media
outlets framed the story.
In a scan
of more than 50 different headlines in Canadian media since
the story broke, including multiple stories by the CBC, CTV, Global, the
National Post and the Globe and Mail, there was only one instance in a Toronto
Star headline where Therrien was mentioned by name. While there were details
about him contained in the body of the story, to the public the headlines made
it seem that the story was purely about Mr. Singh rather than the actions of
Therrien that created this controversy.
The headlines and coverage of the incident are part of a pattern that communities of colour have seen often where insufficient media attention is given to the underlying racism that is the catalyst for racist acts. In Singh’s case, the fact that the media largely ignored Therrien, allowed his BQ colleagues to run interference for him, and didn’t dig into why he was the lone BQ MP to vote “no” on Singh’s motion, raises questions about the decision makers in the newsrooms of the nation, and why they and their news teams framed the story as they did.
The headlines and coverage of the incident are part of a pattern that communities of colour have seen often where insufficient media attention is given to the underlying racism that is the catalyst for racist acts. In Singh’s case, the fact that the media largely ignored Therrien, allowed his BQ colleagues to run interference for him, and didn’t dig into why he was the lone BQ MP to vote “no” on Singh’s motion, raises questions about the decision makers in the newsrooms of the nation, and why they and their news teams framed the story as they did.
Why was
there singular media focus on Singh rather than Therrien, the man who set off
this chain of events? Why didn’t the media ask Therrien about why he opposed
Singh’s motion when his entire caucus supported it? Why did the rules of the
House of Commons sanction the person of colour who called out the racism, and
ignore the person who instigated this furor?
What
happened in the House of Commons and how media covered the story brought racism
to light in Parliament in a way that has infuriated many Canadians. It showed
that even in one of the most privileged places in Canada, a chamber of equals,
systemic racism and white privilege go hand in hand, and that comes through in
how media covered that privilege as well.
Fareed Khan is
founder and chair of the anti-racism activist group Canadians United Against
Hate.
© Copyright Toronto Star Newspapers Ltd. 1996 - 2020
© Copyright Toronto Star Newspapers Ltd. 1996 - 2020
©
2020 The View From Here. © 2020 Fareed
Khan. All Rights Reserved.
No comments:
New comments are not allowed.