As Canada Day approaches should Canadians celebrate a nation complicit in Gaza’s genocide?

To celebrate Canada's birthday as usual would be to ignore the cries of Palestinian children, the destruction of an entire society, and the blood of the innocent that stains Canada’s moral fabric.

By Fareed Khan

A version of this article can be found on Substack.

As Canada Day approaches, the question of whether this country deserves celebration becomes impossible to ignore. Those who speak out against Canada’s role in Israel’s genocide—whether Palestinian, Jewish, or otherwise—are routinely met with smears, professional retaliation, and accusations of being antisemitic simply for opposing state violence. The cost of dissent has grown steep, with pro-Palestinian supporters being harassed, doxed, vilified and fired from their jobs, revealing a political culture increasingly hostile to those who still express moral clarity. This climate is especially chilling for racialized Canadians, particularly Palestinians, Arabs, and Muslims, who have been villified by politicians and right‑wing commentators as threats to “Canadian values.” Their calls for justice are dismissed, their identities scrutinized, and their loyalties questioned. It is difficult to celebrate a nation that punishes those who demand accountability for mass atrocities.

This repression is not an aberration but part of a long and troubling continuity. Canada’s foundations rest on the dispossession and genocide of Indigenous people. Residential schools, the Indian Act, forced relocations, and systemic discrimination were not unfortunate side notes—they were central pillars of Canadian government policy. It was and is all part of an ugly history shaped by policies rooted in white supremacy, and sustained by institutions and systems built on racist foundations that continue to oppress and marginalize racialized communities across Canada.

The same colonial logic that justified the destruction of Indigenous societies at home now echoes in Canada’s support for the destruction of an Indigenous people abroad. The parallels are stark. A nation built on colonial violence and genocide now enables colonial violence and genocide in the Middle East. In such a context, the idea of celebrating Canada Day becomes morally troubling.

This also raises an unavoidable question. How can a nation claim pride in its commitment to human rights and international law while ignoring the human rights of Palestinians facing genocide, selling weapons to the perpetrators, and disregarding the very treaties it is obligated to uphold? The contradiction is too glaring to be papered over with fireworks and patriotic speeches.

Canada’s response to what is happening in Gaza—a place that has been described as a “concentration camp” by many respected human rights voices—cannot be dismissed as a foreign policy miscalculation. It reflects a deeper erosion of the values Canadians are told to celebrate on July 1st. The ideals of justice, equality, and compassion—values often wrapped in the symbolism of the maple leaf—ring hollow when that same symbol is implicated in the suffering of an entire people. Domestic achievements such as universal healthcare or multiculturalism cannot absolve a nation of its role in enabling mass atrocities. A country cannot claim moral leadership abroad while facilitating a genocide.

History offers no refuge from this reckoning. After the Holocaust, many Germans claimed that they did not know the extent of the horrors unfolding around them. Today, such claims would not be believed because the genocide in Gaza has been visible to the world every single day for almost a thousand days. The evidence of genocidal crimes committed by Israel is overwhelming, the suffering undeniable. Conservative estimates place the Palestinian death toll near 100,000, including tens of thousands of children. Entire neighbourhoods have been reduced to rubble, entire family lines erased, and an entire society pushed to the edge of annihilation.

These atrocities have unfolded in real time, documented by journalists, human rights organizations, Palestinians themselves, and even Israeli soldiers. The world has watched the destruction livestreamed to their devices. And yet Canada—despite its constant declarations of commitment to human rights and international law—has chosen a path of political cowardice and moral abdication. It continues to sell weapons and support the state responsible for these crimes while offering only empty rhetoric about peace and restraint. In such a context, silence is not neutrality, it is complicity. And complicity should not be something to be celebrated on July 1st.

When this genocide ends—and it will end—there will be those eager to insist they opposed it from the beginning. But history will not be fooled. It will remember who spoke, who acted, and who chose complicity over conscience. The Canadian government’s continued arms sales to Israel, its refusal to impose broad sanctions, its failure to uphold its legal obligations under the Genocide Convention, and its unwillingness to back international legal efforts such as South Africa’s genocide case against Israel at the International Court of Justice—all of these decisions implicate this country and its leaders. And it also stains those who choose to celebrate Canada Day as though these realities do not exist.

As July 1st approaches, Canadians who believe in human rights face a profound moral dilemma. To celebrate as usual would be to ignore the cries of Palestinian children, the destruction of an entire society, and the blood of the innocent that stains Canada’s moral fabric. The threats facing Canada from Donald Trump pale in comparison to the ethical crisis unfolding within its own borders. A nation that enables genocide cannot credibly celebrate itself as a force for good.

However, there is beauty in Canada—its landscapes, its diversity, its potential for justice. But potential is not achievement, and celebration is not owed, it is earned. A nation complicit in genocide celebrating while that genocide continues is a perversity that should be called out. To mark Canada Day with pride under these circumstances would be to participate in a collective act of denial.

This July 1st should not be a day of fireworks and flag‑waving. It should be a day of reckoning—a moment to confront Canada’s role in Israel’s crimes, to demand an end to the policies that enable them, and to insist that this country finally honour the international conventions and laws it claims to uphold. Only then can Canada begin the long process of restoring its moral integrity. Only then can it aspire to be a nation worthy of pride.

Until that day arrives, Canada Day is not a day to celebrate. It is a reminder of the work that remains to be done to fulfill the potential of this nation.

© 2026 The View From Here. © 2026 Fareed Khan. All Rights Reserved.

An allegory about Palestinian oppression, suffering and erasure

Sometimes rather than explaining global events in geopolitical terms it requires telling a story to which ordinary people can personally connect.

 

By Fareed Khan

A version of this article can be found on Substack.

So imagine if someone showed up at your home, a place where you and your extended family have lived for generations, and said, “I’m moving into your house.”

You would laugh at first, because who says something like that. But then the person pushes their way through the door, carrying old papers and documents, and a confidence so absolute it feels unreal. You ask why they think they can just walk in. They hold up a faded document and declare, “My great, great, great, great grandfather lived here once. That means this home is rightfully mine.”

You stare at them, confused. Your family has lived in this house for generations. You have the keys, the deed, the memories, the photographs, the stories. Every corner of the home carries the imprint of your life. But this stranger insists that a distant ancestor’s presence—centuries ago—gives them the right to reclaim everything you built, and the land on which it sits.

Before you can process what’s happening, they push past you and your family and head upstairs to claim the guest room.

At first, the intruder insists it’s only symbolic, a small space that “means a lot.” You resist, but the authorities tell you to be reasonable, to compromise, to make room for someone whose claim they view as legitimate. Refusal, you’re warned, would make you the unreasonable one. The authorities even help the intruder settle in and assist them in inviting other relatives.

Soon, more rooms are taken—one after another—to accommodate their growing family. When you push back, the authorities threaten you with charges. Each expansion is framed as necessary, as part of reclaiming what was “always theirs.” You’re assured you still have plenty of space, even as your world shrinks around you.

Your children end up sharing a single bedroom. Your parents are moved into the hallway. Your kitchen becomes a narrow strip of counter you’re allowed to use only at certain hours. The living room—once the heart of your family—now has a locked gate, and you must request permission to enter.

You protest. You show your deed, your family photos, the bills you’ve paid, the repairs you’ve made. None of it matters. The intruders dismiss it all, and the authorities echo their indifference.

“My ancestor was here first,” the intruder repeats. “That’s the only thing that matters.”

Then their friends begin arriving at the intruder’s invitation.

Not one or two—dozens. They arrive with boxes, furniture, tools, and a sense of entitlement that mirrors the first intruder’s. They spread across the house, occupying rooms you never agreed to give up. They claim they’re helping “restore the home to its rightful owners.” Your presence, they insist, is temporary—tolerated only because removing you all at once would be troublesome.

Any objection is treated as aggression. Defending your own home is framed as a threat. Your resistance becomes proof, in their eyes, that you don’t deserve the shrinking space you still occupy.

Locks appear everywhere. Doors once open now have metal bars. Windows you used to open for fresh air are sealed shut. You’re told it’s for “security,” for “order,” and that good behavior might lead to fewer restrictions.

It never does.

Instead, the intruders begin building new rooms—extensions, additions, expansions—right on top of your garden, your yard, your driveway. They pave over the soil where your grandparents planted olive trees. They tear down the shed your father built with his own hands. They erect fences that slice through your property, separating your family from one another.

When you ask why, the intruders shrug. “We need more living space. And this home was always meant for us.”

You remind them of their earlier promises to leave certain areas untouched—spaces where your family could still live with dignity. They nod politely, then quietly build over those areas too. Everything is justified as temporary, as necessary, as something you should be grateful isn’t worse.

Meanwhile, you’re squeezed into smaller and smaller corners. You’re forbidden from renovating, expanding, or even fixing a broken window without permission. The intruders, however, build freely and endlessly. They even restrict your access to the bathroom and ration your water, while using as much as they please.

One morning, you wake to find that the room you were sleeping in has been reclassified as “disputed space.” You’re allowed to stay only if you remain silent, avoid drawing attention, and never mention that this was your home long before the intruders arrived.

Your children grow up hearing the intruders tell visitors, “This house was empty when we arrived,” or “The family living here never really belonged,” or “We brought civility to this place.” Your children look to you for clarity. They know the truth, but the intruders speak with such authority—and the local authorities reinforce their claims—that the broader community begins to believe them.

Then comes the inversion of reality. The intruders begin accusing you of being the trespasser.

You’re told you don’t belong. You’re told you should be grateful for whatever scraps of space remain. Your presence is framed as the obstacle to peace. If only you stopped insisting on your rights, everything would supposedly be fine.

This is said while the intruders sit in your living room, holding your keys, lounging on your family’s furniture which they now claim as their own..

When you try to tell your story—when you try to explain what happened, when you try to show the community the truth—the authorities silence you. Your account is dismissed as “too political,” “too emotional,” or “too upsetting for the intruders.” Acknowledging your history is labeled “controversial.”

Imagine that. Being told that the theft of your home is a sensitive topic, and that the feelings of those who took it matter more than the reality of what your family endured. Imagine being told your history is optional, debatable, or inconvenient. Imagine being told your suffering must be softened or erased so the intruders can feel comfortable in the house they stole.

Now imagine living like this not for a day, nor for a year, but for generations.

Imagine raising children who have never known safety in their own home. Imagine growing old in a place where every door is controlled by someone else, and being told repeatedly that you should be grateful for whatever space you’re allowed to occupy.

And then imagine being blamed for the entire situation.

As the years pass, something even darker unfolds. The intruders begin speaking openly about your family as if you are pests. They use words meant to strip you of your humanity—cockroaches, snakes, human animals. These slurs are tossed around casually, as if describing vermin rather than the human beings whose home they invaded.

At first, you think it’s just hateful language. But the language becomes a prelude to violence.

One night, one of the intruders corners your eldest son in the hallway. Your son dares to assert that this is his home, that he has a right to walk freely in it. The intruder responds with lethal force. Your son does not survive.

When you demand justice, the intruders dismiss your grief and the authorities express “regret” but support them. Your son is branded “dangerous,” accused of provoking the attack. Had he stayed in the tiny corner allotted to your family, they insist, he would still be alive.

You’re not allowed to mourn openly. Cry too loudly and you’re accused of disturbing the peace. Speak your son’s name and you’re accused of incitement. Try to tell visitors what happened and the intruders cut you off, calling you a liar.

Their friends and the authorities nod along. They admire the polished floors and expanded wings, pretending not to see the broken rooms where your family now sleeps. They praise the intruders’ “restoration work,” ignoring the fact that the home was beautiful, whole and thriving before it was invaded and taken over.

When you show these visitors old photographs proving your family lived here long before the intruders, they dismiss the evidence as “inconclusive” or “too complicated.” Dwelling on history, they warn, might “inflame tensions.” Some even accuse you of rewriting the story.

Meanwhile, the intruders grow bolder. They patrol the hallways with weapons, claiming it’s for their safety. Your presence, they insist, is the threat. If you weren’t so “hostile,” they wouldn’t need to defend themselves.

But you know the truth. The weapons are tools of domination.

One afternoon, your daughter tries to retrieve a favorite book from the bedroom that used to be hers. An intruder blocks her path. She is small, frightened, and desperate to reclaim a piece of her childhood. When she reaches for the book, the intruder reacts with lethal force.

You bury another child.

Once again, the intruders blame you. Your daughter “shouldn’t have been there.” She “posed a risk.” Her death is described as “regrettable” but the intruder had “no choice.”

The authorities—who claim to be neutral and care about justice—look uncomfortable for a moment, then return to admiring the intruders’ new kitchen remodel. You’re urged to “move on,” to “focus on the future,” to stop talking about what happened.

You realize the authorities favour the intruders. They have chosen to ignore the truth because acknowledging it would require confronting the injustice they have supported for years through their actions and inaction.

The intruders continue expanding, building new rooms on top of your children’s graves. They celebrate their “progress.” They host parties in the home they stole, toasting their own “resilience” and “security,” never mentioning the ugliness and brutality that made it possible.

Your family, once whole, now lives in fear, grief, and suffocating confinement. You cling to memories of what the home once was, even as the intruders insist those memories are false.

And through it all, they repeat the same refrain: “This house was always ours.”

They speak with such confidence that outsiders believe them. They repeat it so often that even some in the community begin to doubt the historical truth.

But you remember.  You remember every room, every wall, every tree in the yard. You remember the laughter that once filled the halls. You remember the life your family built long before the intruders arrived with their ancestor’s distant claim.

And you know—with a clarity that cannot be erased—that what happened to your home was not fate, not destiny, not a misunderstanding.  It was theft.  It was violence.

It was the deliberate erasure of a people’s place in the world.

And no amount of denial, propaganda, or dehumanizing language can change the truth of what was taken from you.

The end of the story hasn’t been written.  Because the intruders—Zionists and their supporters—will face justice one day for taking from the homeowner—Palestinians—their rights, their dignity, their property, their possessions, and their lives.

The Reverend Martin Luther King Jr. said “The arc of the moral universe is long but it bends toward justice.”  And that is why Palestinians will ultimately prevail, despite the bleakness they have endured for generations.  Ultimately, Palestinians will be free from the river to the sea. Because that is their destiny.

© 2026 The View From Here. © 2026 Fareed Khan. All Rights Reserved.

Zionism has enabled Western complicity in Israeli crimes – The ideology must be purged from society to reclaim our souls

The West, Israel's chief enabler, must confront the deep poison of Zionism that has corrupted our politics, media, moral compass, and stolen our humanity

By Fareed Khan 
A version of this article can be found on Substack.

In the shadowed corridors of power, where truth is often the first casualty, our Canadian and Western society teeters on the brink of a profound moral collapse. This crisis, one of our own making, stems from the unwavering support Western nations have lavished upon Israel—a rogue state that has flouted international law since its creation on stolen Palestinian land.

For decades Israel and its Zionist agents in the West have coerced, threatened, bribed and gas lit politicians, news media outlets, and societal leaders to champion Israel’s interests while turning a blind eye to its war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide. Zionism has infiltrated and corrupted the very fabric of Western democracy to the point that Western society consistently sided with Israel even when it launched wars against its neighbours and committed the most heinous of crimes. The abyss between the West’s proclaimed values and grim reality widens daily, threatening not just the Palestinian people but the soul of our society. The death of truth, as we have witnessed in the ongoing horrors of Gaza, marks the triumph of unchecked evil that should have died with the worst horrors of the 20th Century.

Our hold on objective reality frayed irreparably in October 2023, when Israel unleashed its “final solution” on Gaza—an enclave long described as an open-air Palestinian prison and concentration camp, where every facet of life is dictated by Israeli control. What has unfolded is nothing short of genocide, a crime affirmed by the United Nations, the International Association of Genocide Scholars, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, B’Tselem, renowned Israeli Holocaust scholars, the nations backing South Africa’s case at the International Court of Justice (ICJ), international legal scholars. The ICJ itself ruled that Israel’s actions constitute plausible genocide. Yet, in Western media and political discourse, the word “genocide” is verboten, reporters muzzled from humanizing Palestinians or acknowledging the scale of atrocity. Major outlets in the US, Canada, the UK, and Germany—CNN, CBC, BBC, Deustsche Welle—exile this truth, mirroring the complicity of Western governments that could halt the slaughter but instead supply arms and diplomatic cover.

Birthed in 1948 amid the ashes of the Holocaust, Israel, for good or ill was supposed to be a refuge for European Jews in the Middle-East. Instead, it became a monster, perpetrating evils against Palestinians akin to those of Nazi Germany—not in sheer numbers but in the calculated intent to eradicate a people. This is not hyperbole. Israel’s founding involved the ethnic cleansing of 750,000 Palestinians in the Nakba, the destruction and physical erasure of over 500 Palestinian villages, and the seizure of Palestinian land through terrorism and force. From its admission to the United Nations in 1949 under Resolution 273, Israel’s acceptance was conditioned on fulfilling Resolutions 181 (partition plan) and 194 (right of return for Palestinian refugees). It has flagrantly failed both, refusing to allow refugees back and expanding settlements on occupied Palestinian land in violation of international law. This defiance set the stage for decades of impunity, enabled by Western patrons who prioritized geopolitical alliances over justice for Palestinians.

Prominent voices, including Jewish intellectuals who could not be dismissed as biased, have long exposed Israel as a criminal terrorist state. Noam Chomsky, the eminent linguist and political commentator, has decried Israel’s actions as genocidal, arguing that US support for its occupation threatens world peace. He has advocated for a single binational state, rejecting the ethno-nationalist framework that sustains apartheid-like conditions. Chomsky’s critique echoes a historical pattern, one where Israel’s systematic dispossession of Palestinians mirrors colonial genocides, where settlers expel indigenous populations and take over their lands.

Norman Finkelstein, son of Holocaust survivors and a scholar of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, brands Israel a “rogue state“ that violates every international norm. In his exhaustive analysis of the suffering of Gaza’s people, Finkelstein documents how Israel’s assaults—killing thousands, predominantly civilians—are flagrant war crimes, shielded by Western complicity. He asserts that Israel’s intent is not self-defence but the complete destruction of Palestinian society, a genocide in slow motion, accelerated since 2023. Finkelstein’s work underscores how Zionism’s propaganda has inverted victim and perpetrator, portraying oppressed Palestinians as aggressors, and the Israeli aggressors as victims.

Ilan Pappe, the Israeli historian exiled for telling the truth about Israel’s criminal history, chronicles the nation’s founding as premeditated ethnic cleansing. In his seminal work The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine, Pappe details Plan Dalet, the blueprint for expelling Palestinians, drawing parallels to genocidal campaigns. He contends that Zionism’s colonial ethos has poisoned Israeli society, leading to the current Gaza genocide where hospitals are bombed and aid blocked in defiance of international law. Pappe’s exile from Israeli academia highlights Zionism’s grip, where dissent is silenced and truth about Israeli crimes is branded as treason.

Miko Peled, born into a prominent Zionist family, the son of the renowned Israeli General Matti Peled—a hero of the 1948 and 1967 wars—has emerged as one of the most unflinching pro-Palestinian voices from within Israeli society. Despite his privileged upbringing and early military service, Peled underwent a profound transformation, particularly after the tragic death of his 13-year-old niece in a 1997 Palestinian suicide bombing in Jerusalem. This personal loss drove him to deeply examine the narratives he had inherited, ultimately leading him to condemn Israel as a “terrorist state” and an apartheid regime.

From his insider perspective, Peled exposes the Israeli military as the world’s best-equipped, best-trained, and best-fed terrorist organization, arguing that Israel’s systemic control over Palestinians—through the denial of basic rights, routine bombing of civilians, and the maintenance of concentration-camp-like conditions in Gaza—amounts to institutionalized terrorism, all sustained by Western indifference and complicity. His courageous critique shatters the enduring myth of Israel as a beleaguered democracy under constant threat, instead revealing a society where widespread public support for ethnic cleansing and genocide exposes deep-seated supremacist attitudes.

Similarly, Gideon Levy, the acclaimed Ha’aretz columnist who has long risked his life reporting from the occupied Palestinian territories, offers a searing indictment of Israel’s moral erosion. He portrays the occupation as a metastasizing cancer that festers through the daily atrocities committed by settlers and soldiers alike, while much of the Western media averts its gaze. Levy has repeatedly warned that Israel’s genocidal campaign in Gaza has rendered the country a global pariah, its carefully cultivated reputation now in ruins amid the flood of unfiltered images from Gaza documenting widespread horror and suffering. Through his persistent pleas for empathy and humanity, Levy works to rehumanize Palestinians in the eyes of Israelis and the world, directly challenging the Zionist propaganda that systematically dehumanizes them—often reducing them to labels like “human animals“ or terrorist threats to be eradicated. His unflinching journalism stands as a vital counterforce to the narratives that enable ongoing oppression and violence.

Even Albert Einstein, the renowned physicist and committed humanist, issued stark warnings about the dangers of political Zionism. He firmly opposed the establishment of a sovereign Jewish state, believing it would cultivate a narrow, aggressive nationalism that would ultimately inflict deep and lasting harm on Judaism itself. In December 1948, he co-signed a public letter—published in The New York Times—condemning Zionist paramilitary groups such as the Irgun and Stern gangs as “fascist” organizations whose tactics and ideology bore disturbing similarities to those of the Nazis. Einstein’s foresight proves hauntingly prescient today. The creation of Israel in 1948 resulted in the ethnic cleansing of more than 750,000 Palestinians through forced expulsions, the erasure of over 500 Palestinian villages, and widespread terror, planting the seeds of perpetual conflict that Western governments have sustained for generations through unwavering military, financial, and diplomatic backing.

These prominent critics—Jewish intellectuals, historians, and activists of conscience—are far from outliers. Together, they form a powerful chorus exposing the toxic influence of Zionism, which has fuelled endless violent conflicts across the Middle East. Since its founding in 1948, Israel has systematically violated the United Nations Charter, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Geneva and Hague Conventions, the Genocide Convention, and the most fundamental tenets of humanity—all in pursuit of its national and geopolitical ambitions.

Yet Western leaders continue to recite the tired mantra that “Israel has a right to defend itself,” even as this racist apartheid state bombs schools, razes hospitals, engineers starvation in Gaza, and assassinates journalists with complete impunity. This unwavering complicity has poisoned Western societies from within. The United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, Canada, and their allies have pour billions in military hardware into Israel—arms that have been used to slaughter innocents—while organizations like AIPAC in the US (now widely regarded as a politically toxic organization) and similar pro-Israel lobbies in other countries, exert relentless pressure to silence dissenting political voices.

The toxicity of Zionism permeates far beyond the halls of government, seeping into the core of Western institutions and everyday discourse. Universities routinely suppress pro-Palestinian voices through disciplinary measures, event cancellations, and funding threats, stifling academic freedom and open debate. Major Western news outlets engage in pervasive self-censorship, marginalizing or outright dehumanizing Palestinian suffering by avoiding terms like “occupation” or “genocide,” framing reporting to align with pro-Israel perspectives, and downplaying civilian casualties. Societal leaders—politicians, influencers, and public figures—cynically conflate legitimate criticism of Zionism with antisemitism, a dangerous tactic that deflects scrutiny from Israel’s criminal actions and shields it from accountability.

This infiltration has been insidious and pervasive, embedding Zionist ideology deep within Western minds and structures over generations. Relentless pro-Israel propaganda has indoctrinated populations, consistently portraying Israel as the eternal victim besieged by existential threats, while systematically vilifying Palestinians as inherent aggressors unworthy of empathy, rights, or even basic humanity. This narrative inversion has taken firm root, profoundly shaping public opinion, driving policy decisions, and dictating media framing across the United States, Europe, and beyond—ensuring that Israel’s violations of international law are met with silence or justification rather than condemnation.

Recent polling data from Israel itself lays bare the extent of extremist radicalization within Israeli society. A March 2025 survey of Jewish Israelis, commissioned by Pennsylvania State University and published by the Israeli newspaper Ha’aretz, revealed shocking levels of support for extreme measures against Palestinians. Fully 82% of respondents endorsed the forced expulsion of all Palestinians from Gaza—often framed as “transfer” but amounting to ethnic cleansing, a clear war crime under international law. Even more disturbingly, 47% agreed that the Israeli army should emulate the biblical conquest of Jericho by killing every inhabitant of captured enemy cities, effectively supporting the total extermination of all men, women and children in Gaza. This mirrors the dehumanization tactics once employed by the Nazis against Jews, reducing an entire people to existential threats that justify total eradication—yet the Western alliance continues to provide Israel with political, military, and financial support.

These attitudes among Israelis are not fringe outliers but reflect a broader societal shift, compounded by decades of Zionist indoctrination, occupation, settlement expansion, and impunity. The United Nations has passed repeated resolutions condemning Israel’s actions—more than against any other member state—yet these are routinely ignored, actions supported by the US. Israel’s admission to the UN in 1949 came with explicit conditions, including acceptance of the partition plan and the right of return for Palestinian refugees. It agreed to the resolutions but has fulfilled neither, instead perpetuating a brutal, decades-long occupation and committing genocidal acts with utter disregard for human life and international norms. Western complicity in this defiance not only enables ongoing crimes but erodes the credibility of global institutions and the rule of law itself.

The poison of Zionism is clearly evident in Gaza over the past 27 months, where the ideology has allowed Israel to justify genocide, and commit mass murder with a true death toll far exceeding the underreported official figures that dominate mainstream narratives. Independent analyses of Israeli crimes paints a far more harrowing picture of the scale of devastation inflicted since October 2023. Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor has documented more than 75,000 Palestinians killed, underscoring the relentless toll on civilian life.

However, there are other analyses of Palestinian casualties that are far higher. Drawing directly from Israeli military data, Ben Gurion University professor Yaakov Garb’s rigorous spatial and demographic study estimates at least 377,000 Palestinians dead or missing—presumed dead—amid the rubble, and widespread disappearances, with roughly half believed to be children. Even more starkly, a 2025 study by Australian academics Richard Hill and Gideon Polya, building on epidemiological projections from The Lancet and accounting for both direct violence and indirect deaths from engineered famine, blockades, disease, and a collapsed healthcare system, places the total dead and missing at over 680,000. These staggering figures reveal a deliberate strategy of deprivation as a weapon of war, where starvation and denial of aid compound the horrors of bombardment, eroding the foundations of international humanitarian law and human rights. Western governments’ continued military, financial, and diplomatic backing sustains Israeli crimes, allowing violations to proceed with near-total impunity and further undermining the “international legal order” they claim to defend.

When truth is assaulted and twisted in such an Orwellian fashion, monsters are inevitably created. Israel’s leaders and their Western agents, armed with some of the loudest and most well-funded propaganda machinery in the world, have seized control of Western narratives for far too long. But cracks are now widening in this facade, especially in the midst of the unfolding genocide in Gaza. Since October 2023, millions around the globe—from Tokyo to London to New York—have cast off the Zionism’s blinders, pouring into streets in unprecedented protests, numbering in the hundreds of thousands, to demand justice for Palestinians, and an end to the slaughter in Gaza.

The moment has arrived for the West, Israel’s chief enabler, to confront the deep poison of Zionism that has corrupted our politics, media, and moral compass. We must insist on real accountability from our own governments by halting the flow of military hardware and trade that sustains the violence, rigorously enforcing the ICJ’s rulings on plausible genocide, and press for Israel’s suspension or expulsion from the United Nations until it finally honors the conditions of its 1949 admission, which it has defied for decades by denying Palestinian refugees their right of return and expanding illegal settlements on occupied land.

We must expose and challenge those politicians who have been coerced, lobbied, or outright bought by pro-Israel groups, holding them to account for their complicity in Israeli crimes. Similarly, we need to confront media executives and outlets that perpetuate anti-Palestinian bias through selective reporting, language restrictions, and the erasure of Palestinian humanity. These entrenched structures of prejudice—built on decades of Zionist indoctrination—must be dismantled if we are to reclaim an honest public discourse.

Only by wresting truth back from distortion and denial can we pull back from the moral abyss into which we are sliding. Zionism’s adherents have infiltrated and degraded our societies, turning empathy into suspicion and justice into taboo. Rejecting this toxic influence is the path to restoring our shared humanity. The monster we helped birth and sustain through arms, aid, and silence must be starved of support, not continually nourished. For the sake of Palestinians enduring unimaginable suffering, and for the sake of our own souls, the cloak of complicity and darkness must finally be shed.

© 2026 The View From Here. © 2026 Fareed Khan. All Rights Reserved.

As 2025 ends Israel's violence in Gaza during sacred holidays reveals more of their inhumanity

Gaza's ancient Christian community—dating back to the time of Christ—is now on the brink of extinction due to decades of Israeli oppression, attacks, displacement, and the destruction of holy sites.

By Fareed Khan

A version of this article can be found on Substack.

 

As the world marked the sanctity of Christmas and Hanukkah in late December—a season traditionally devoted to peace, reflection, and family—the Gaza Strip faced unrelenting violence at Israeli hands into the year’s final days. Reports from the region depicted ongoing Israeli military operations that showed no pause, turning potential moments of respite into further devastation.

For example, air strikes continued across Gaza during the holiday period, with attacks reported in areas like Shuja’iyya and other neighbourhoods, resulting in civilian casualties and underscoring a disregard for humanitarian norms, despite a ceasefire which Israel signed with Hamas in October. These were not isolated events as Israel’s unrelenting assault on Gaza over the holidays killed dozens, including children, in locations throughout the enclave. Such actions shattered any holiday spirit and heightened the existential threat to Gaza’s ancient Christian Palestinian community—one of the world’s oldest—now on the brink of extinction due to decades of prolonged conflict, displacement, and the destruction of holy sites.

Gaza’s Christian Palestinians, numbering fewer than 600 today, trace their roots back over 2,000 years, predating many modern religious and political boundaries. The ongoing bombardment, combined with Israel’s 16 year long siege and blockade, has drastically reduced their numbers, with churches damaged or destroyed and family lineages wiped out. Holiday periods in prior years witnessed attacks on sacred sites, including church compounds that resulted in deaths and injuries. This pattern points to Israel’s systematic erasure of cultural and religious heritage in Gaza, pushing Palestinian Christians toward oblivion amid actions widely described by international human rights organizations, genocide scholars, Jewish intellectuals, and international bodies like the United Nations and the International Court of Justice as carrying genocidal intent. The irony during the holiday season is stark. Hanukkah celebrates light triumphing over darkness and resistance to oppression, yet the self-proclaimed Jewish state’s policies contravene these principles, oppressing a vulnerable population in ways that contradict Jewish scriptural commands—such as the Torah’s 36 exhortations not to oppress the stranger and the Talmud’s teaching that destroying one life is akin to destroying an entire world.

These developments occurred against more than 800 days of genocidal violence by Israel, with the Palestinian death toll exceeding 75,000 as of mid-November, with more than 30% of the victims being children and 20% being women. In addition, the humanitarian crisis has worsened due to restrictions on aid crossing into Gaza, resulting in famine, disease, and severe winter hardships. Even as leaders worldwide shared holiday messages, Israel’s military assault continued in violation of international law, including the Genocide Convention, prompting widespread condemnation from human rights groups. This continuation of military attacks during sacred holidays exposes an unwillingness to heed universal pleas for mercy, demonstrating again Israel’s utter disregard for Palestinian lives and international law.

In Canada, diverse voices have raised alarms about these events. On December 23, 2025, advocacy groups gathered on Parliament Hill in Ottawa in a media conference to highlight the crisis, drawing from religious, ethical, medical, Indigenous, and human rights viewpoints. Organizations like Independent Jewish Voices, Doctors for Humanity and others urged stronger action, stressing Canada’s duties under international law. Since the beginning of Israel’s assault on Gaza Jewish Canadians opposing the violence have also voiced profound distress, contending that Israel’s conduct abuses power and contradicts core ethical tenets of Judaism, including Hanukkah’s emphasis on justice. Indigenous leaders, via the Assembly of First Nations—representing over 600 chiefs and hundreds of thousands of First Nations citizens—have also expressed solidarity with Palestinians, drawing parallels to colonial experiences of genocide against Indigenous people in Canada and have criticized Canada’s complicity in Israel’s crimes.

As 2026 approaches, Canadian leaders must respond to the millions of citizens who, over more than two years, have demanded resolute steps to address the crisis in Gaza. Polls indicate growing consensus with over half of Canadians viewing Israel’s actions as genocide, with figures around 52% in recent surveys linking aid restrictions and military operations to such crimes. Another poll showed similar concurrence near 49%, signalling increasing frustration with Ottawa’s restrained approach. Protests, petitions, and parliamentary initiatives have reinforced these calls for alignment with human rights standards.

Prime Minister Mark Carney’s silence amid Israel’s holiday attacks echoes the failure of his predecessor Justin Trudeau to fully acknowledge Palestinian suffering or uphold international human rights norms, which jeopardize Canada’s international moral standing. To stand on the right side of history, the government must move beyond its mealy mouthed rhetoric, that does nothing to change the reality on the ground in Gaza, into policy and action. The fact that Canada labelled Russian violence in Ukraine as “genocide” in a unanimous April 2022 parliamentary resolution but refuses to do the same for Gaza, despite comparable atrocities by Israel, like targeting civilians and destroying infrastructure, speaks volumes about the embedded anti-Palestinian racism of Canada’s political elites. Without direct intervention by Western democracies, including Canada, which are the only ones with the power to halt Israel’s atrocities, this nation and others in the Western alliance will be remembered for abandoning the rule of law and enabling horrific crimes on par with what Nazi Germany committed during the Holocaust.

Ending this violence also requires reclaiming compassion and independence from external pressures. Zionist lobbying has long influenced Canada’s Middle East policy, with legacy Jewish organizations acting as agents of the Israeli government. In caving to their pressure Canada has abandoned its international legal obligations under the UN Charter, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Genocide Convention. But Carney and his government must resist the pressure of these lobbies to restore national autonomy and empathy. Nations like Ireland, Norway, and Spain provide a blueprint for the path Canada should follow. They have recognized Palestinian statehood without conditions (unlike Canada), denounced Israel’s military actions as genocide, and implemented measures like trade reviews and arms restrictions. Ireland has pushed for broader European Union trade sanctions and supported South Africa’s ICJ case alleging genocide under the Convention. Norway and Spain have also indicated their intention to intervene in the case, and Spain has labelled Israel’s actions as genocide halting arms exports and barring arms from other nations heading to Israel from transiting its territory.

These steps—halting preferential trade, sanctioning officials, and backing accountability—prove that ethical positions can reinforce international law without undermining security or sovereignty. In contrast, Canada’s ongoing arms transactions with Israel constitute criminal complicity in its crimes in Gaza. To stop the suffering and align with the principles of universal justice, Ottawa should implement a comprehensive two-way arms embargo, apply targeted sanctions on Israeli leaders, implement a broader trade embargo, and enforce a lasting ceasefire—standing in solidarity with Palestinians being subjected to horrors the rest of us can only imagine.

Inaction by Canada would cement this nation’s position as criminally complicit in another erasure of Indigenous peoples. Palestinians, as the historic inhabitants of the land with ancient ties to historic Palestine, endure dispossession reminiscent of Canada’s genocidal legacy with First Nations, Inuit, and Métis peoples. The residential school system, assimilation policies, and land seizures amounted to policies of genocide, the effects of which continue to be felt to this day. Supporting or ignoring similar patterns with Palestinians—mass displacement, cultural destruction, community obliteration, land theft—would make a lie of Canada’s support for the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People, as well as its reconciliation commitments to its own Indigenous people. Indigenous voices in Canada have highlighted these connections, advocating solidarity with Palestinians to avoid repeating past wrongs. By partnering with principled nations and fulfilling its international legal obligations, Canada can safeguard its international standing and aid the cause of justice and freedom for Palestinians.

In this pivotal moment, with the holidays receding and as the New Year begins, the choice is clear. Israel’s unchecked criminal actions over decades, and especially during sacred holidays for Christians and Muslims, exposes a profound and deliberate moral failing, one that Canada can no longer excuse or ignore. Listening to Canadians, pushing back against external pressures from Zionist agents of the Israeli government, and joining global efforts to end the genocide will not only save Palestinian lives but redeem this nation’s soul. The alternative—complicity—will condemn future generations in this country to grapple with yet another enduring moral failure and damage this country’s international reputation beyond measure.

Yet, as 2026 dawns, there remains a profound reason for hope for the Palestinian people. Their extraordinary resilience—evident in the enduring spirit of families attempting to rebuild amid ruins and ongoing Israeli attacks, communities preserving ancient traditions, and a global movement growing ever stronger in solidarity—affirms that no amount of violent oppression by Israel can extinguish the quest for justice, freedom, and dignity. With increasing voices worldwide demanding accountability and change, the New Year carries the promise that sustained international pressure will finally pave the way for a just peace, allowing Palestinians to reclaim their rights, rebuild their homeland, and hopefully achieve a lasting peace.

© 2025 The View From Here. © 2025 Fareed Khan. All Rights Reserved.

A broken world on the eve of Christmas: Where is Christ's message in the West?

The irony is stark, Western nations, born from Enlightenment ideals intertwined with Christian ethics, now export a version of "faith" that is weaponized for a powerful oppressor.

By Fareed Khan

A version of this article can be found on Substack.

As the world hurtles toward Christmas Day 2025, over 2.3 billion Christians prepare to celebrate the birth of Jesus Christ—a figure whose teachings of peace, compassion, mercy, and justice have shaped civilizations for two millennia. Yet, in this season of supposed goodwill, the actions—or inactions—of leaders in the world’s Western predominantly Christian nations reveal a profound hypocrisy. The Western alliance, led by countries like the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Germany, and France, claims a heritage rooted in Christian values. But their policies and silences in the face of atrocity tell a different story—one of moral abdication that mocks the very ethos of the faith they profess.

Consider the land where Jesus Christ was born, preached, and died—the Holy Land, now a cauldron of genocide and suffering in Gaza and the broader Palestinian territories at the hands of Israeli oppressors, one that has been this way for decades. Here, amid the rubble of what was once Bethlehem’s neighbour, heinous crimes unfold daily—indiscriminate bombings, forced displacements, ethnic cleansing and a humanitarian catastrophe that the International Court of Justice has labelled as plausibly genocidal, and that the United Nations has labelled as undoubtedly genocidal.

Christians and Muslims alike—brothers and sisters in humanity—are caught in this vise of violence, their lives extinguished or upended in ways that echo the ancient laments of the prophets. Palestinian Christians, a dwindling community, and one on the brink of extinction in Gaza, tracing their roots to the time of Christ, face existential threats, their churches destroyed and their faithful scattered. Muslims, too, endure unimaginable horrors, from starvation sieges to the targeting of hospitals and school, and the destruction of anything that could sustain human life.

And what of the West’s response? These self-proclaimed beacons of Christian democracy arm the genocidal Israeli perpetrators—the US vetoes UN resolutions calling for ceasefires, and nations like the UK and Germany offer platitudes about “self-defence” while ignoring the disproportionate carnage. The US, under both Republican and Democratic administrations that routinely invoke God in speeches, provides billions in military aid to Israel, enabling the very genocidal acts that ravage the birthplace of Christianity. Canada, the UK, Germany, and France follow suit, condemning and suppressing domestic anti-Genocide protests, labelling criticism of Israel as antisemitism, and turning a blind eye to war crimes documented by human rights organizations like Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch. In all of this where is the Sermon on the Mount? Christ’s call proclaiming “blessed are the peacemakers” rings hollow when Western leaders prioritize geopolitical alliances over halting a slaughter that has claimed over 75,000 Palestinian lives, with more than a third of them children.

This isn’t a mere policy failure, it’s a betrayal of Christ’s core teachings. Jesus preached love for enemies, turning the other cheek, and caring for the least among us—the poor, the oppressed, the stranger. He flipped tables in the temple against exploitation and hypocrisy. Yet, Western leaders, many of whom publicly identify as Christians—think of US presidents quoting scripture or European prime ministers attending Christmas services—embody none of this. They champion “Judeo-Christian values” as a cloak of indemnity while preparing for endless wars, and doing nothing about growing economic inequality, and environmental catastrophe, all while allowing atrocities in the Holy Land to continue unabated.

Germany’s “Staatsräson“ policy ties its identity to Israel’s security, but at what cost to Palestinians, Christian or Muslim? France’s laïcité policy masks its oppression of Muslims seeking justice for Palestinians and its complicity in the horrors Israel is committing. The UK’s historical role in decades of oppression, subjugation and brutalization of Palestinians, beginning with the Balfour Declaration and continuing through its decades of unequivocal support for Israel, is a stain that will never wash away. And Canada, with its multicultural veneer and claims of being a defender of international human rights, joins in blocking international accountability for Israel by opposing the genocide case brought by South Africa against Israel at the International court of Justice.

The irony is stark, these nations, born from Enlightenment ideals intertwined with Christian ethics, now export a version of “faith” that is weaponized for a powerful oppressor. They decry religious persecution elsewhere—say, in China or Iran—yet fund it in the cradle of Christianity, the land were Christ lived and spread his message. If he returned today, would he recognize these leaders as his followers? Or would he see Pharisees, more concerned with rituals and alliances than with justice and mercy? More likely the latter.

The world feels irreparably broken, fractured by endless conflicts, climate crises, and a erosion of shared humanity. It’s easy to despair, to see only the darkness enveloping places like Gaza, Ukraine, or our own divided societies.

What can or should we do about how seemingly broken the world is? Can we really do anything to fix it when our efforts are so small when compared to the enormity of the task at hand? History and our experiences teach us that what is broken can be mended with time, tenacity and the collective will of people who desire a world better than one we have.

However, in so doing we must remember to do it with humanity and love that is generous, deliberate and unconditional. The truth is the world we see around us, that seems to be falling into darkness, is actually waiting for the light that’s in all of us to shine forth and begin to heal peoples, societies, environments, and the soul of our world.

© 2025 The View From Here. © 2025 Fareed Khan. All Rights Reserved.

800 days of genocide in Gaza and little action by “moral” Western nations to stop the slaughter

The West's apathy towards Palestinians today mirrors the 1930s treatment of Jewish refugees on the MS St. Louis fleeing Nazis in 1939, who were denied entry by Cuba, the US, and Canada. 

By Fareed Khan

A version of this article can be found on Substack.

Today, December 16, 2025, the world marks a sombre milestone—800 days since Israel’s genocide against Palestinians in Gaza began on October 8, 2023. What was initially framed as a defensive response to the October 7th Hamas attack has morphed into a relentless campaign of death, destruction, and displacement, that international legal experts, Holocaust scholars, human rights organizations, and the United Nations have described as the crime of genocide. And despite a tenuous ceasefire established in early October 2025, daily violations by Israel continue, and the humanitarian catastrophe persists unabated. Palestinians in Gaza, trapped in what was already the world’s largest concentration camp, now face existential annihilation, their plight met with global indifference that underscores their status as the most persecuted minority in the world today.

The evidence of this systematic persecution lies not only in the staggering loss of life but in the West’s deliberate refusal to intervene and its aggressive efforts to muzzle voices condemning Israel’s actions. Western governments—the so-called defenders if the “international rule of law’—including the United States, Canada, and European nations, have provided billions in military aid to Israel while offering Palestinians mere platitudes and minimal humanitarian support. This double standard, coupled with systematic suppression of pro-Palestinian activism, reveals a profound anti-Palestinian bias embedded in Western policies, governments, and institutions.

Consider the words of former US Secretary of State Antony Blinken on November 10, 2023: “Far too many Palestinians have been killed.” At that point, mere weeks into the conflict, the death toll was already deemed excessive. Now, over two years later, the death toll as reported by Euromed Human Rights Monitor, one of the only international organizations able to verify Palestinian casualty figures, places direct deaths at over 75,300, with more than 173,800 wounded. These numbers, however, are widely acknowledged as underestimates due to the total collapse of Gaza’s civil infrastructure—hospitals bombed, morgues overwhelmed, and bodies buried under rubble without identification.

Independent analyses of Palestinian casualties paint an even grimmer picture. A study by Ben-Gurion University professor Yaakov Garb, utilizing Israeli military data and published by Harvard Dataverse in June 2025, estimates that between 377,000 and 400,000 Palestinians are unaccounted for, presumed dead or buried under Gaza’s rubble. This figure aligns with reports of mass graves and unrecovered bodies under destroyed buildings. Even more alarming is the epidemiological assessment by Australian scholars Gideon Polya and Richard Hil, who, in their July 2025 report “Skewering History: The Odious Politics of Counting Gaza’s Dead,” project a total death toll exceeding 680,000 by mid-2025 when including indirect deaths from starvation, disease, and deprivation. This estimate, which factors in a ratio of four indirect deaths per direct violent one by Israel, draws from precedents in conflicts like Iraq and Afghanistan, and has been referenced by UN Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese. In a September 2025 briefing, Albanese suggested that if verified, this could mean 380,000 deaths among children under five alone, describing the situation as “apocalyptic” and a “collective crime.”

These figures represent an average of hundreds of deaths per day over 800 days, even during the nominal ceasefire. Over 30% of identified victims are children and 20% women, a disproportionate toll that far exceeds civilian casualties on the Israeli side during the October 7 attack—where the reported 1,200 deaths include military personnel and those killed by Israeli troops under its controversial Hannibal Directive, which prioritizes preventing capture over saving lives. The deaths of Palestinian children, potentially in the hundreds of thousands under broader estimates, have become the emblem of this horror, with images of lifeless bodies in the rubble fuelling global outrage. Yet, this outrage is met with inaction, implying to many that there exists an “acceptable” threshold of Palestinian suffering—a perverse calculus that echoes the dehumanization seen in the actions of Nazis towards Europe’s Jews.

If Blinken’s early assessment was “far too many,” what phrase captures the current reality? The scale rivals the Holocaust in the systematic nature of Israel’s brutality, though differing in the number of dead. Palestinians today are the most persecuted people globally, their oppression evidenced by the West’s complicity. Unlike Ukraine, where Western nations swiftly provided over $330 billion in military, economic, and humanitarian aid, allowing Ukrainians to defend themselves, Palestinians—lacking an army, navy, or air force—receive paltry levels of aid and no military assistance by comparison. The US alone has funnelled at least $21.7 billion in military aid to Israel since October 2023, including $4 billion expedited in March 2025, while aid to Gaza is restricted or blocked by Israel, exacerbating famine and disease. This disparity highlights a racialized hierarchy of victimhood, where brown and Muslim lives (Palestinians) are deemed expendable, while white and Christian lives (Ukrainians) are worth saving.

The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has repeatedly intervened, issuing provisional measures in January 2024 and beyond, ordering Israel to prevent genocide, ensure humanitarian access, and halt incitement. In an October 2025 advisory opinion, the ICJ declared Israel’s occupation unlawful and called for its end, noting plausible risks of genocide in Gaza. Yet, Western powers, including the US with its veto power at the UN Security Council, have shielded Israel from enforcement, allowing violations to continue unchecked.

This inaction is compounded by active suppression of dissent. Western governments have waged a sustained assault on pro-Palestinian voices, using smear campaigns, legal restrictions, and police to silence criticism. In the US, legislation equates anti-Zionism with antisemitism, leading to job losses, doxxing, and investigations of activists. Universities have fired professors and disbanded student groups for Gaza solidarity. In Europe, Germany has banned pro-Palestine conferences, like the April 2025 Palestine Congress in Berlin, ruled unlawful by courts but emblematic of broader crackdowns. France and the UK have imposed disproportionate restrictions on protests, weaponizing terrorism laws against anti-genocide demonstrators.

A 2025 report by the International Federation for Human Rights documented this trend, warning that such actions erode democratic freedoms and violate fundamental rights. Social media platforms, have also censored Palestine-related content, banning accounts and removing posts. This orchestrated silencing ensures that Israeli narratives are given priority while those calling for justice for Palestinians are marginalized, and narratives that call out Israeli war crimes are suppressed.

There are historic parallels that amplify the tragedy. The West’s apathy towards Palestinians today mirrors the 1930s treatment of Jewish refugees. The MS St. Louis, carrying nearly 1,000 Jews fleeing Nazis in 1939, was denied entry by Cuba, the US, and Canada, leading to over 250 of them being killed during Holocaust. Canada’s infamous “none is too many” policy epitomized this racism. Today, Palestinians face similar abandonment with refugees denied asylum, aid convoys bombed, and pleas for intervention ignored.

In Canada, this moral failure is acute. Despite acknowledging its genocidal history against Indigenous peoples—residential schools, forced assimilation, and land theft—the political establishment repeats the pattern with the Indigenous people of historic Palestine. Governments under Justin Trudeau and now Mark Carney have prioritized ties with Israel, ignoring the designation of the nation as an Apartheid state by Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch years before the start of the Gaza genocide. Weekly protests in major cities across Canada, which have drawn tens of thousands, demanding sanctions and justice, have been systematically ignored. An August 2025 Angus Reid poll revealed 52% of Canadians believe Israel is committing genocide, with 61% agreeing aid is deliberately blocked—a sharp rise from prior surveys. Yet, leaders dismiss these voices, complicit in what has been labelled “the most transparent genocide in human history.”

The commitment of ordinary Canadians and global citizens is unwavering. Over two years, millions have marched worldwide, horrified by Gaza’s transformation into a post-apocalyptic wasteland, with more than 90% of infrastructure destroyed, farmland poisoned, water contaminated. Daily life is a struggle against starvation, with children scavenging amid rubble. This has galvanized a new wave of activism, including hunger strikes and boycotts, bridging divides and sustaining resistance.

Canadian politicians—Mark Carney, Justin Trudeau, Pierre Poilievre, Mélanie Joly, Anita Anand, and others—must heed history’s judgment. Unless aggressive action is taken to intervene and halt Israel’s action, their legacy will be one of criminal complicity in genocide, war crimes, and the oppression of a people brutalized for over 75 years. The blood of innocents stains their hands, and Canadians will not forget this moral crisis. Until the West enforces accountability, lifts the blockade, and amplifies suppressed voices, Palestinians remain the world’s most abandoned minority. The 800 days of transparent genocide demand not just words, but transformative action demonstrating that being Palestinian is not a crime.

© 2025 The View From Here. © 2025 Fareed Khan. All Rights Reserved.