Showing posts with label Foreign interference. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Foreign interference. Show all posts

2026-02-15

Alberta separatism endangers all Canadians and fuels US aggression against Canada

By facilitating a separatist referendum Danielle smith has violated her oath of office and allegiance to the crown that she is sworn to uphold.
 
By Fareed Khan 
A version of this article can be found on Substack.

As Canada marks the 61st anniversary the red and white maple leaf flag today (February 15th), a symbol of unity forged in the fires of national identity, we find ourselves confronting an insidious threat from within. The Alberta separatist movement, spearheaded by groups like the Alberta Prosperity Project (APP), may appear marginal but need to be taken seriously by all Canadians, with polls indicating support for separation hovering between 16% and 30% of Albertans. While much of this support is soft and symbolic, based on grievances against Ottawa, this relatively small faction poses an outsized danger to the fabric of Confederation. It weakens Canada at a dangerous moment in history when we face overt aggressions from the United States under President Donald Trump, including tariff wars, annexation rhetoric, and direct meddling in our sovereignty.


Even worse, the movement is riddled with white supremacist, racist, and fascist undertones that go beyond mere fringe elements, amplifying divisions that could profoundly erode social cohesion in Alberta and across Canada. Recent analyses highlight how separatist “town halls” have featured inflammatory anti-immigrant language, including mentions of the “great replacement” conspiracy theory that falsely claims federal policies are designed to displace “old stock” (i.e. white) Canadians with racialized newcomers. Speakers at Alberta Prosperity Project events have scapegoated immigrants as economic burdens and cultural threats, prompting formal complaints to anti-racism organizations like StopHateAB, and contributing to documented upticks in xenophobic harassment and fear among racialized communities.

This xenophobia often intersects with anti-Indigenous sentiments, where separatists portray treaty rights and reconciliation efforts as obstacles to provincial sovereignty, disregarding that historic treaties with First Nations predate Alberta’s existence and bind the Crown directly. Indigenous leaders from Treaties 6, 7, and 8 territories have condemned the movement outright, launching legal challenges and warning that it threatens ongoing reconciliation and Indigenous rights.

These exclusionary narratives align Alberta separatists with broader far-right networks in Canada, including neo-Nazi and white supremacist groups that have historically overlapped with anti-government militias and promoted ideologies of racial homogeneity for white people. Far from being isolated, such racist ideologies normalize hate speech, heighten risks of discrimination and violence against racialized Canadians and Indigenous peoples, and shred the multicultural fabric that defines modern Alberta. This makes the movement’s apparent marginality all the more deceptive in its potential to bring dangerous extremism into the political 
mainstream.

The separatist support, while limited in numbers, is by no means ineffective or benign. Recent surveys reveal that only about 16% of Albertans are “hardline” separatists committed to full independence, with broader support—around 28%—often serving as a protest vote against Ottawa rather than a genuine call for secession. The APP’s petition drive, aiming for 177,000 signatures by May 2026 to trigger a referendum, has garnered attention through community meetings, aggressive campaigning and the effective use of social media. But the relatively small size of the movement belies its impact.  Even a minority movement can destabilize a nation, as history shows with Quebec’s referendums in 1980 and 1995, which nearly tore Canada apart, and set the stage for years of rancorous federal-provincial relations.

In Alberta’s case, the danger is amplified by external forces in the form of Donald Trump and his designs on Canada. In this scenario the province’s oil-dependent economy, strained by federal environmental policies, becomes an issue that could be leveraged by Trump to the benefit of the US as the separatists seek American support.

It seems the separatist camp are ignoring how an independent Alberta would face insurmountable hurdles—currency shifts, border controls, having to take on their share of Canada’s $1.3 trillion national debt, and trade disruptions, as they suddenly fall outside trade agreements signed by the Canadian government.  All the political and economic infrastructure that has taken decades for Canada to build, all of this could cascade into economic turmoil and chaos for Alberta, and would also impact Canada negatively resulting in declining GDP and lost jobs.

Compounding the separatist threat is the movement’s deep entanglement with white supremacist, racist and fascist elements. Alberta has a troubling history of far-right extremism, from the Aryan Guard neo-Nazi group to militant networks like Diagolon, which blends neo-fascism with anti-authority ideologies. While the APP positions itself as a mainstream advocate for provincial autonomy, its events have featured inflammatory anti-immigrant rhetoric echoing white supremacist tropes by members of such groups. Speakers at separatist town hall events have invoked the “great replacement” conspiracy theory, alleging federal immigration policies intend to dilute “old stock” (i.e. white) Canadians. Anti-immigrant sentiments run rampant within the movement, with calls to restrict newcomers in an independent Alberta, portraying them as economic drains and cultural threats. This xenophobia has real-world consequences, with immigrant support groups in Alberta reporting surges in harassment and racist incidents linked to separatist messaging.

Anti-Indigenous racist rhetoric is equally pervasive, with separatists dismissing treaty rights as barriers to sovereignty, ignoring that treaties the Crown made with First Nations existed before Alberta came into being.  These treaties predate its creation by many years before Alberta was carved out of the North-West Territories via a federal statute.  First Nations leaders from Treaties 6, 7, and 8 territories, which cover almost all of the province, have unanimously rejected the concept of separatism, filing constitutional challenges and warning that not only is Alberta’s separation not possible under constitutional and federal laws, but that it undermines reconciliation efforts.

These elements align the movement with broader far-right ecosystems in Canada, where white supremacist groups like the Soldiers of Odin and Three Percenters have proliferated, often overlapping with anti-government militias. By normalizing hate within the movement the separatists not only endanger immigrants, racialized communities, and Indigenous peoples, but also damage Alberta’s social fabric, fostering an environment where a MAGA type movement would become rooted and foster violence similar to what we have seen in the US.

This internal division could not come at a worse time, as Canada grapples with escalating threats from the Trump White House. Since his return to office, the US has imposed near-universal tariffs on Canadian exports outside the Canada-US-Mexico trade agreement (CUSMA), escalating a trade war that has already cost both nations billions. Additionally, since returning to office Trump has repeatedly mused about annexing Canada as the “51st state,” dismissing our border as an “artificial line” and labeling Prime Minister Mark Carney (and former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau) as “Governor” in derogatory tweets. These are not idle jests, as they echo historical American imperialist narratives.

Additionally, APP leaders have held multiple covert meetings with US officials since April 2025, discussing logistics like switching to the US dollar, border security, and even a $500 billion credit line to fund Alberta’s independence. These meetings, confirmed by US State Department staff, represent blatant foreign interference in Canadian affairs, with the goal of exploiting Alberta’s oil and resource wealth and weakening Canada. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has called Alberta a “natural partner” for the US, signaling an intent to carve up our nation. In this context, separatism isn’t just provincial discontent—it’s a seditious fifth column that amplifies American aggression. A fractured Canada would be weaker and ill-equipped to counter Trump’s hegemonic designs in the Western Hemisphere leaving us vulnerable to economic coercion and loss of territory.

At the heart of this peril to Canadian sovereignty is Premier Danielle Smith’s role in enabling separatism. While publicly disavowing independence, claiming to support “a sovereign Alberta within a united Canada,” Smith has taken concrete steps to bolster the movement when her government amended provincial legislation, slashing the referendum petition signature threshold from 600,000 to 177,000, thereby making an independence vote far more feasible. This change directly aids groups like the APP and Stay Free Alberta. Moreover, Smith has permitted United Conservative Party (UCP) MLAs to openly sign the separation petition without repercussion, stating they “can sign whatever petition they want.” Separatist leader Jeff Rath claims multiple UCP caucus members have done so, blurring the lines between governance and disloyalty.

Smith’s Mar-a-Lago visit with Trump in January 2025 and her refusal to denounce US meddling further suggest alignment with forces undermining Canada, and should be viewed as sedition under the Criminal Code. Section 59 defines seditious intention as advocating force to effect governmental change, while Section 61 criminalizes seditious conspiracy with up to 14 years’ imprisonment. Though experts note sedition laws are archaic and rarely applied without violence, Smith’s facilitation of the separatist cause goes far beyond mere political tolerance.  By amending legislation to reduce the referendum petition signature threshold—making a separation vote far more attainable—she has actively facilitated separatism and thereby enabled a movement that seeks to dissolve Alberta’s place within the Canadian federation. These steps constitute not only potential sedition but also a direct violation of her oath of office.

As Premier, Smith swore under the Oaths of Office Act to be “faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, her heirs and successors, according to law,” and to “diligently, faithfully and to the best of my ability execute according to law the office of Premier.” By making it easier for those pushing separation to orchestrate a referendum that would repudiate allegiance to the Crown and the constitutional unity of Canada, she has breached this solemn pledge of loyalty to the Sovereign and the federation she is sworn to uphold. Former deputy premier Thomas Lukaszuk has publicly accused her and her caucus of violating their oaths, arguing that elected officials who support separation while drawing salaries funded by the Crown are disloyal hypocrites.

By most accounts this amounts to sedition—aiding a movement that invites foreign powers to dismantle the federation. Alberta MLAs who have signed the separation petition are equally in violation of their identical oaths of office, flirting with disloyalty and warranting investigation as potential subversion. In an era of escalating US threats, such conduct erodes national unity and demands immediate accountability—whether through federal oversight, calls for their resignation from positions held under the Crown they have betrayed, or calls for their arrest under the criminal code.

Canada’s strength lies in unity symbolized by our flag, which replaced colonial symbols with a maple leaf representing all provinces. Allowing Alberta separatism to fester, unchecked with its racist undercurrents and foreign collusion, invites catastrophe. It weakens Canada against Trump’s bellicose policies, from tariffs that could devastate our economy to annexation fantasies that mock our sovereignty.

Let this flag day serve as a call to recommit to the federation for which Canadians past and present have fought and died.  In their name and in the name of all Canadians who believe in a united Canada we must reject separatism in all its forms, stand resolute against American aggression, and hold our own political leaders to account for actions that undermine the country they swore to serve. Only through this collective resolve can we preserve the inclusive, diverse, pluralistic, and resilient Canada that has endured for generations. Failure to act decisively now risks not merely Alberta’s isolation, but the gradual unravelling of the entire nation generations of Canadians have worked so hard to sustain.


© 2026 The View From Here. © 2026 Fareed Khan. All Rights Reserved.

2024-12-10

OP-ED -- Israeli influence on Canadian politics is a prime example of foreign interference

Canada’s advocacy for human rights is conditional, as we can see with the ongoing genocide in Gaza
  
 
 
As Canada’s foreign interference public inquiry enters its 11th month it does so in the shadow of an International Criminal Court decision to issue arrest warrants for Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu and for former defense chief Yoav Gallant for committing war crimes and crimes against humanity against Palestinians in Gaza since October 2023. 
 
It is important to mention this latest development in the Gaza genocide in the context of Canada’s inquiry because as Israel continues to commit heinous crimes against Palestinians, its agents in Canada also continue to work to manipulate, coerce and extort Canadian political leaders to give Israel a pass as it violates international laws with impunity, not just since last October but for decades.
 
Headed by Justice Marie-Josée Hogue the inquiry has been examining the involvement of foreign governments and their agents in Canada’s politics and government decisions, looking at issues like manipulating, coercing, or threatening Canadian politicians and government officials to support the interests of foreign governments in this country.
 
During the hearings scrutiny has largely centered on governments such as China, Russia and India. A striking omission in this discourse has been Israel, a nation that has exerted substantial influence in shaping Canadian policies related to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the Middle-East broadly for decades.
 
The discourse surrounding foreign interference should encompass the actions of not only adversarial regimes but also so-called “allies” like Israel, which has demonstrated an unethical proclivity to coerce Canadian officials while working to stifle criticism of its policies and actions in the occupied Palestinian territories. Over the decades, Canadian agents acting on behalf of Israel (like CIJA and B’nai Brith) have utilized a multifaceted approach to influence and intimidate Canadian politicians who criticize Israel, coercing alignment with Israeli governmental interests, and systemically stifling criticism regarding its policies toward Palestinians and the crimes it has committed against the Palestinian people. 
 
This contrasts sharply with Canada’s swift and vocal condemnation of foreign aggression in Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. The Canadian government and its citizens rallied in support of Ukraine, condemned Russian actions, and emphasized the importance of human rights and the international rule of law. Yet, when confronted with allegations of war crimes, crimes against humanity, and ongoing genocide by Israel against Palestinians Canada’s response has been muted, revealing profound biases at play in this country’s political ecosystem and the way issues around it are portrayed in the news media. This is the result of decades of Israel’s Canadian agents intimidating and extorting the Canadian government and elected officials to support Israel lest they be tarred with the label of “antisemitism”.
 
Canada responded with vigor to Russia’s aggression with the government imposing sweeping sanctions on Russian entities, expediting aid to Ukraine, and actively participating in international coalitions to condemn Russia’s actions. The Canadian government’s support for Ukraine contrasts sharply with its relative apathy relating to Israeli oppression of and aggression towards Palestinians, which have been met with excuses or silence.
 
The international community has witnessed shocking atrocities committed by Israel against Palestinians for years and particularly since October 2023 when the genocide in Gaza began. These actions have drawn condemnation from international human rights organizations, yet Canada’s political response has been markedly apathetic. When the issue of Israeli crimes against Palestinians has been raised by Canadian human rights activists, politicians have reframed the pro-Palestinian narratives through the lens of antisemitism rather than addressing Israeli violence against the Palestinian people. Such tactics protect Israel and its criminal leaders from scrutiny while silencing voices advocating for Palestinian justice and freedom.
 
Unfounded allegations of antisemitism are frequently used as a tool of censorship by Israel and their Canadian allies. But the conflation of legitimate criticism of Israel with anti-Jewish hate only serves to obstruct open discussions about the plight of Palestinians and is effectively victim blaming. This dynamic has enabled and fed anti-Palestinian racism, and resulted in a reluctance by many Canadian politicians to confront or acknowledge Israel’s criminal behaviour for reasons related to domestic politics. It creates an atmosphere where criticism of Israel government is met with hostility that stifles voices advocating for truth in the face of extreme injustice.
 
The overwhelming influence of the Israel lobby within Canada’s political and media landscape significantly shapes public opinion and discourse around issues related to Palestine and the Palestinian people. Many Canadian newspapers and TV news networks selectively present information downplaying or ignoring Israel’s criminal actions while amplifying narratives demonizing Palestinian resistance. This creates an illusion of consensus on the issue but ignores a critical examination of Israel’s egregious human rights crimes, and perpetuates anti-Palestinian prejudice and Islamophobia.
 
In this context we must look at why foreign interference by Israel remains largely unacknowledged and unchallenged. While the history of Jewish persecution and the Holocaust has led to the establishment of protective doctrines shielding Israel it cannot and should not be at the expense of Palestinian rights. In examining Israel’s exceptional influence in Canadian politics, we have to acknowledge that there is deeply entrenched anti-Palestinian racism at all levels of Canadian society, and much of it is perpetrated by Zionist organizations and their political, media and corporate allies acting in the interests of Israel.
 
Advocacy for Palestinian rights should be understood as a struggle against occupation, colonialism and ethnosupremacy. In acknowledging that Israel perpetuates a system of violent and racist apartheid, we must also support the human rights of Palestinians, and stand firmly against rhetoric that mutes these arguments through a lens of anti-Palestinian hate. Educational institutions, media, and public officials must work towards dismantling the narratives that enable this racist hierarchy, and emphasize the urgency of the Palestinian struggle for freedom.  
 
In order to be thorough the Hogue Commission must investigate Israel, a state that utilizes intimidation and coercion to influence discourse around Palestinian rights within the Canadian government (and in the governments of other nations). Investigating countries like China and Russia but ignoring Israel would be a clear demonstration of prejudice and racism on the part of the inquiry, which would sacrifice Palestinians and their rights on the altar of political expediency. Only by including Israel can the inquiry fully expose the depth of foreign governments’ influence on Canadian politics, and make the changes needed to preserve Canadian democracy against the influence of dangerous foreign actors. In light of the arrest warrants issued by the International Criminal Court relating to the Gaza genocide it should motivate Justice Hogue to expand the terms of the inquiry, and bring to light how an apartheid racist state committing genocide has interfered in Canadian politics and government policies not just for the past year, but for decades. 
 
Fareed Khan is the founder of Canadians United Against Hate and has written and commented extensively about issues around racism and human rights.
 
© 2024 Rabble.ca.  This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
© 2024 The View From Here.  © 2024 Fareed Khan.  All Rights Reserved.