Showing posts with label Fascist. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Fascist. Show all posts

2025-11-07

How did the US become a nation that Is embracing fascism?

Nine months into Trump’s second presidential term fascism is no longer an imagined threat, it is real and it poses a legitimate threat to American democracy. 
A version of this article can be found on Substack.

On November 4, 2025, America delivered a thunderous rebuke to Donald Trump’s second presidency. In New York City, Zohran Mamdani—a 34-year-old Ugandan-born, South Asian, Muslim democratic socialist—shattered a political dynasty by defeating former governor and primary challenger Andrew Cuomo to become the city’s first Muslim mayor. Across the Hudson River, New Jersey voters elected Democratic Congressional Representative Mikie Sherrill governor by a double-digit margin, extending Democratic control of the governor’s mansion for an unprecedented third consecutive term. In Virginia, former Representative Abigail Spanberger became the state’s first female governor, while state Senator Ghazala Hashmi won the lieutenant governor’s race, becoming the first Muslim woman elected to statewide office anywhere in the United States.



These were not routine off-year elections. They were political earthquakes. Turnout in New York City shattered records not seen since 1969, with more than two million ballots cast. The common denominator in every decisive victory was American president Donald Trump—though his name appeared on no ballot. Voters, especially in diverse urban and suburban strongholds, sent an unmistakable message—we reject the cruelty, the racism, and the authoritarian drift that has defined his second term.

Yet the question remains, searing and urgent. How did the United States—a nation that once styled itself as a “beacon of democracy”—become a country that is now embracing fascism, an ideology that more than 400,000 American military personnel died fighting in World War Two? The answer is not a mystery. It is the oldest story that the US has never told with honesty. The most powerful nation in the history of the world was not founded on freedom. It was founded on stolen land, cleared by indigenous genocide, and built by African slaves, who were broken by force. Everything else is decoration.

Let’s start at the beginning. Long before the first enslaved Africans arrived in North America, European settlers embraced the doctrine that the indigenous people of what became the United State were an inferior race. “Our nation was born in genocide,” Martin Luther King Jr. observed in 1963, “when it embraced the doctrine that the Indian . . . was an inferior race.” The Declaration of Independence itself denounces “the merciless Indian Savages,” codifying racial hierarchy in the nation’s founding text. Settlers did not merely conquer Native Americans as they expanded into the interior of the continent, they exterminated them with the help of the US government. By 1900, the pre-Columbian Indigenous population in the contiguous US had plummeted by 96%, from millions to fewer than 250,000. The survivors were herded onto reservations—America’s first concentration camps—with their movements and every aspect of their lives controlled by the government.

Slavery followed the same logic. The US Constitution’s three-fifths clause, its fugitive slave provision, and its extension of the slave trade enshrined white supremacy into the nation’s legal DNA. When the Confederacy lost the Civil War, no one thought that it would win the peace. Reconstruction’s promise of multiracial democracy was drowned in blood with 2,000 Black people lynched in the decade after the Confederacy’s surrender at Appomattox. Black Codes morphed into Jim Crow laws, and the Supreme Court blessed the concept of “separate but equal” in Plessy v. Ferguson.

The monuments to the Civil War and Confederate generals told the story. They were not erected in the years immediately after 1865 to mourn the fallen. They rose in the first two decades of the 20th Century and then again, in subsequent decades and between 1954 and 1968, precisely when the white supremacist elites and the racist infrastructure they had built felt threatened. The United Daughters of the Confederacy erected more than 400 statues, each one a warning that Black advancement in the US will be met with terror. When Brown v. Board of Education struck down school segregation in 1954, legislatures in the US south answered with massive resistance and a fresh wave of Confederate memorials. The message was the same—this is white man’s country and Black Americans shouldn’t expect to be part of top tiers of society or expect to achieve the “American dream.”

The truth is that the racist foundation of American society never crumbled after the Civil War. They remained intact and those who benefitted from it adapted. The racists became sheriffs, mayors, governors and senators, and the logic of white supremacy changed shape but never lost its grip. Mass incarceration of Blacks replaced slavery on plantations. The war on drugs replaced the Ku Klux Klan’s targeting of Black people. And economic policies and local ordinances that kept Black Americans from achieving their full potential, replaced Jim Crow laws. The result has been that by 2025, the United States imprisons more people than any nation in history, who are disproportionately Black and racialized.

Enter Donald Trump into the political arena in 2015. He did not invent American fascism or racism, but he did use the foundations that had been laid by others to advance his agenda. And he was unapologetic about saying the unspeakable out loud. When he began his presidential campaign he called Mexican immigrants “rapists”. In 2017 he equated neo-Nazis with counter-protesters, saying there were “good people” on both sides during the white supremacist Charlottesville protests. In 2024 he vowed “retribution” against political enemies if he became president, even suggesting he would use the military. His former chief of staff, John Kelly—a former Marine four-star general—called out Trump’s policies as fascist during the 2024 presidential campaign, saying that he would rule like a fascist if re-elected. Thirteen other former Trump officials signed an open letter backing Kelley’s criticism of Trump.

Nine months into Trump’s second presidential term fascism is no longer an imagined threat, it is real and it poses a legitimate threat to American democracy. In his first 100 days, Trump invoked emergency powers to impose tariffs on every nation on earth, citing “fentanyl” and “trade deficits” as pretexts. Average taxes on imports soared to 18 percent—higher than any time since the Great Depression. Car prices jumped $4,700 overnight; grocery staples followed. Economists warned of a “fiscal folly” that would shrink GDP by 1.3 percent and cost the average American household $1,200 annually. Yet the administration celebrates the billions flowing into federal coffers, money that will likely be used to fund suppression of constitutional rights and civil liberties.

Speaking of suppression, it’s already spreading across the US in the form of crackdowns on illegal immigrants and anti-genocide protesters. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents have become Trump’s Gestapo, disappearing hundreds of undocumented immigrants and legal protesters, sending some to a jungle jail in El Salvador, while threatening to deport others for their Palestinian activism to nations like Rwanda. Trump has also threatened to strip birthright citizenship by fiat and has declared transgender identities “invalid.” Additionally, billions in federal funding has been withheld from universities that refuse to purge diversity, equity and inclusion programs from their curriculum, and banned-word lists have circulated in government agencies, with threats of firing if they are included in government websites and documents. The Justice Department has also deployed election monitors to Democratic Party strongholds, citing unproven election fraud.

This is textbook fascism. A cult of the leader, a mythology of national humiliation, a promise of rebirth through violence and purity. Trump’s rhetoric—threats to annex Canada, seize Greenland, retake the Panama Canal, suspend the Constitution—echoes Benito Mussolini’s imperial fantasies. Trump’s allies speak openly of a third presidential term in violation of the 22nd amendment, martial law, and the suspension of elections. The Supreme Court’s ruling in Trump’s favour that presidents enjoy broad criminal immunity for actions taken in office, has emboldened him further.

Yet Tuesday’s elections prove the rot is not total. In city halls and statehouses, the victories show that a multiracial, multi-faith coalition of people from all socio-economic backgrounds can push back against fascist elements in the US. Mamdani quoted American socialist Eugene Debs in his victory speech. Spanberger pledged to shield Virginia from federal overreach. Sherrill vowed to “solve problems, not manage them.” While Hashmi promised leadership that “lifts people up.”

These victories are not the end, they are the beginning of new movement, because fascism advances when good people normalize the unthinkable. Germany did not fall to the Nazis in a single night. It fell in a thousand small surrenders over a period of years, and the US stands at the same precipice now. To prevent what happened to German from taking hold in the US, Americans must follow Germany’s post-World War Two example. It must enshrine in public memory the racist and genocidal history of the US, and implement laws that make it unrepeatable. It must criminalize racist and fascist symbols like the Confederate flag, which must be banned from public spaces. The true history of American history must be taught in every classroom. In addition, the debt owed to Indigenous nations and descendants of the enslaved must be paid, because reparations are key to healing the national soul.

The voters in the 2025 off-year election have shown the path. They looked into the abyss and said, “Not here. Not now. Not ever.” The question is whether a majority of Americans are willing to follow, or whether they will let the euphoria of a decisive victory fade and then go back to business as usual. American must realize that they are running out of time as the fascist menace grows, but Tuesday proved that change is possible.

The future of the US is in the hands of those who are willing to do as Mamdani and his followers did, and push back against the establishment. They have already told them their time is over, and it’s time for a new generation of progressives and social democrats to lead the way. If America is to be saved from those who have brought the country to the precipice those who rallied to support progressive and left wing candidates like Mamdani need to organize and launch a national movement led by people like the new mayor of New York City and others who share his vision of what could be achieved if they commit to political change.


© 2025 The View From Here. © 2025 Fareed Khan. All Rights Reserved.


2025-03-28

Trump’s crackdown on pro-Palestinian protesters signals a slide into fascist authoritarianism

This crackdown serves as a broader warning to all Americans: political dissent will not be tolerated.  If the government can detain and deport legal residents for exercising their rights, what protections remain for anyone else?
  
 
In recent months, a chilling pattern has emerged on American university campuses.   Students and faculty, many of whom hold green cards or student visas, are being arrested, detained, and threatened with deportation for participating in pro-Palestinian protests or speaking out against Israel’s genocidal crimes in Gaza.  These individuals, exercising their constitutionally protected right to free speech, have found themselves targeted by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) under the directives of the Trump administration for their political protests.  This is not merely a policy disagreement or an immigration enforcement issue — it is a stark demonstration of authoritarianism, one that echoes the repressive tactics of fascist and dictatorial regimes, and signals a dangerous erosion of democracy in the United States. 



The First Amendment of the US Constitution guarantees the right to freedom speech, a cornerstone of American democracy.  Protests, even those that challenge government policies or those of powerful allies like Israel, are not only legal but are a vital part of the nation’s political fabric.  Yet, the Trump administration has chosen to weaponize an obscure law — one that allows the Secretary of State to deport non-citizens deemed a threat to US foreign policy — to silence dissent.  This law, rarely invoked in the past, was intended to address genuine national security risks, not to punish students and scholars for their political views.  By repurposing it to target pro-Palestinian voices, the administration reveals its true face, one that is fascist and racist, that intends to intimidate, suppress, and punish those who dare to criticize Israel’s crimes and US complicity, in what Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch and the International Court of Justice have described as a genocide in Gaza.

The number of protesters targeted are far greater than the few whose stories have been covered by the news media.  Secretary of State Marco Rubio recently disclosed that the State Department has revoked the visas of at least 300 foreign students, and many others are in the government’s sights.  This figure, however, likely underrepresents the full scope of the crackdown, as high-profile cases covered by the media — such as those of Mahmoud Khalil, Rumeysa Ozturk, Momodou Taal, and Yunseo Chung — are just the tip of the iceberg.  These individuals, all racialized immigrants with legal status in the US, have been singled out for their activism.  Their stories paint a grim picture of a government willing to trample constitutional rights and deploy Gestapo-like tactics to intimidate protesters and enforce ideological conformity.

Consider Mahmoud Khalil, a green card holder married to an American, who led protests at Columbia University.  He now languishes in a Louisiana ICE detention center, his green card revoked, as the State Department seeks to deport him.  Or Rumeysa Ozturk, a Fulbright scholar and PhD student at Tufts University, detained by plain clothes ICE agents near her home for writing an op-ed critical of her university’s ties to companies supporting Israel.  Momodou Taal, a Cornell graduate student and dual UK-Gambia national, faces deportation proceedings after being a prominent voice in pro-Palestinian demonstrations.  And Yunseo Chung, a 21-year-old permanent resident who has lived in the US since she was seven, is now at risk of being deported to South Korea because of her constitutionally protected protest activities.  These are not isolated incidents but part of a systematic campaign targeting hundreds of students and faculty who have spoken out against the Gaza genocide.

The parallels between the actions of the Trump administration to authoritarian regimes are unmistakable.  In Russia or Communist China, dissenters are routinely “disappeared” into detention centres, their human rights denied under the guise of protecting state interests.  Today, the Trump administration is employing similar tactics, using ICE as a modern-day equivalent to the Soviet KGB to round up and silence those who challenge America’s support for Israel.  The racialized nature of these detentions — targeting people of colour — further underscores the administration’s fascist undertones, evoking the scapegoating and exclusionary policies of 20th-century fascist dictatorships.  What we are witnessing is not about national security, it is about control, power, and punishing those whose opinions and views with whom Trump disagrees or opposes.

Legal challenges are mounting as attorneys for those detained argue that the government’s actions violate the Constitution and represent egregious government overreach.  The use of a foreign policy statute to suppress free speech is a flimsy pretext, one that courts are likely to scrutinize closely.  Yet, the damage is already being done.  The chilling effect on campuses is very real — students and faculty, particularly those in the US on visas or green cards, now face a stark choice: speak out about Israel’s human rights crimes and risk detention, or remain silent and abandon their principles.  This is not the hallmark of a free society but of a dictatorship where dissent is met with retribution and imprisonment.

The Trump administration’s motivations appear twofold.  First, it is signalling unwavering loyalty to Israel and its influential Zionist supporters in the US, who have loudly condemned the protests.  By cracking down on pro-Palestinian activism, Trump is doing the bidding of a foreign government and its domestic allies, prioritizing their interests over the basic rights of individuals in the US.  Second, this crackdown serves as a broader warning to all Americans: political dissent will not be tolerated.  If the government can detain and deport legal residents for exercising their rights, what protections remain for anyone else?   This is the behaviour of a dictator who believes he is above the law, unbound by the Constitution, and free to act with impunity.

The administration’s defenders might argue that these measures are necessary to maintain order or protect US foreign policy interests.  But such claims crumble under scrutiny.  The protests have been overwhelmingly peaceful, and the individuals targeted pose no credible threat to national security.  Mahmoud Khalil is not a terrorist, he is a husband and human rights activist.  Rumeysa Ozturk is not a spy, she is a scholar who wrote an editorial in a university newspaper.  The government’s actions are not about safety — they are about silencing voices that challenge the status quo.  This is the essence of authoritarianism — the use of state power to crush opposition and criticism, regardless of legality or morality.

The implications extend far beyond the current moment.  If the Trump administration succeeds in normalizing these tactics, the precedent will be set for future crackdowns on any group or cause deemed inconvenient.  Environmental activists, racial justice advocates, or critics of US militarism could be next.  The erosion of free speech and assembly rights does not stop with one issue — it metastasizes, undermining the democratic foundations of the nation.  What we are witnessing in the US is not a temporary overreaction but a deliberate step toward a fascist state where dissent is criminalized, human rights are ignored, and the government operates without accountability.

The American public must recognize this for what it is, a betrayal of the values the US  claims to uphold.  The Constitution is not a suggestion, it is the bedrock of the nation’s identity.  By targeting pro-Palestinian protesters, the Trump administration is not just attacking a specific group of people — it is attacking the very idea of freedom.  The detained students and faculty are not the only victims, every American who cherishes their rights is at risk.  Silence in the face of the Trump administration’s overreach is complicity. 


History offers a sobering lesson.  Regimes that begin by targeting minority and marginalized groups — immigrants, students, religious communities — rarely stop there.  The Gestapo in Nazi Germany did not emerge overnight.  It was built through incremental steps, each one justified as necessary until dissent was extinguished entirely.  The US is not yet Nazi Germany, but the parallels are too close for comfort.  The arrest and detention of legal residents for exercising their rights, the use of immigration laws as a political weapon, and the blatant disregard for constitutional protections, are the hallmarks of a government sliding into fascist authoritarianism.

The Trump administration’s actions demand a forceful response.  America’s Courts must strike down these abuses of power, Congress must investigate and hold those responsible accountable, and citizens must raise their voices — on campuses, in the streets, and at the ballot box — to reject this descent into fascism.  The detained students and faculty are not threats to America they are its conscience, reminding Americans of the principles they risk losing.  If Americans allow these voices to be silenced, they will forfeit the claim to being a free nation.  The time to act is now, before the last vestiges of democracy are swept away by a dangerous regime that day by day is showing that it knows no bounds and will tolerate no dissent.
 
© 2025 The View From Here.  © 2025 Fareed Khan.  All Rights Reserved.

2024-11-14

OP-ED -- Trump’s re-election doesn’t bode well for tolerance in Canada

With a far-right populist entering the White House, what does it mean for Canada’s own far-right political leader?
 

The re-election of Donald Trump to a second term as president reverberates far beyond the United States, particularly affecting Canada, America’s closest neighbor and largest trading partner. This political shift will have a social and cultural impact on Canadian society the way it did during Trump’s first presidency when his political rhetoric legitimized and enabled hate and racism.

 
In recent years, the rhetoric surrounding migrants, refugees, and 2SLGBTQIA+ rights has grown increasingly toxic, with many trends in Canada tracking back to the US. Trump’s first term exemplified the weaponization of fear against minority communities for political gain (the Muslim ban), a tactic he employed again during the 2024 presidential campaign. He stoked anxieties about “the other” and used lies and unfounded claims to link them to potential economic turmoil and social disorder if he is not re-elected.

Trump’s initial political rise capitalized on the anger and dissatisfaction of many Americans, framing certain minority groups — Arabs, Muslims, migrants, and refugees — as enemies. This strategy rallied his base and emboldened hate groups, resulting in a notable increase in hate crimes across the US from 2015 (when he started his campaign) to 2021, when he instigated a riot in Washington DC to prevent the certification of the 2020 presidential vote. According to FBI statistics, hate incidents surged during his presidency, highlighting the dangerous fallout of inflammatory rhetoric aimed at vilifying minority communities.

Canada witnessed a disturbing rise in hate directed at Muslims after Trump’s 2016 victory that culminated in the tragic 2017 murder of six worshippers at a Quebec City Mosque by a man influenced by Trump’s racist narratives.  In subsequent years incidents of hate continued to increase as did Trump’s rhetoric targeting certain minorities.

With Trump’s re-election, Canadians must brace for the potential fallout of strategies borrowed from Trump’s playbook by Conservative Party leader Pierre Poilievre in Canada heading into the next election, which could include inciting anger, feeding rage, blatant lies, and exploiting and exacerbating societal divisions for political gain. Poilievre’s approach to date mirrors that of Trump and populist politicians in other Western democracies who seek to win by catering to the fears and basest instincts of their electorates.

The connections between the rise of populism in Canada post-2016 and what could unfold during Trump’s second term are troubling. One cannot help but draw parallels between Trump’s 2016 victory and how it exacerbated social divisions as Conservatives changed their campaign style, and what could occur in Canada during his second administration, and its impact on the Canadian political ecosystem.

The socio-political implications of Trump’s return are concerning, particularly in light of statements from many former Trump officials labeling him a fascist and unfit to hold public office. Historically, the rise of authoritarian regimes often begins with the marginalization of vulnerable populations, which Trump did during his first administration, and during this presidential campaign. Comparisons between Trump and the emergence of fascist regimes in Europe in the 1920s and 1930s may seem extreme but history has shown us that the seeds of bigotry, hatred and social breakdown sprout in times of fear and uncertainty, especially when stoked by politicians.

As Americans navigate the implications of Trump’s second term, Canadians must also confront our interconnected realities. The political climate in the US directly influences Canadian policies and attitudes, particularly among conservative circles. The rise of hate and bigotry during Trump’s first presidency spilled over into Canada with deadly consequences resulting from conservative political rhetoric, and the same could happen again. Statistics Canada has reported increasing hate crimes numbers annually for the past decade, a troubling trend that represents only one per cent of actual incidents. If history and recent right wing political tactics are any indicators then Canadians should brace for a surge in hate related incidents as hate groups are emboldened by Trump’s re-election.

In the US it seems that hateful and bigoted political narratives have been normalized if Trump’s campaign and his victory are the barometer by which to measure such things.  If we are heading in the same direction in Canada, with similar political narratives becoming the norm, it is a threat to the fabric of our society.  Over the next four years, it is crucial for Canadians to remain vigilant and proactive in combating hate, particularly when it is enabled by politicians.  We must defend the values of inclusivity that define our nation, and resist any attempts by right wing political leaders to exploit fear and stoke prejudice against minority communities for political advantage.

The late Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau once remarked that being America’s neighbor is akin to sleeping next to an elephant — we feel every twitch and grunt. Trump’s re-election is like that elephant having a nightmare, with flailing arms and legs that will inevitably leave Canada bruised and possibly bloodied.

While Americans have to live with him day to day for the next four years Trump’s re-election and the risks it poses to Canada’s sociopolitical landscape must be acknowledged, and we must recognize the dangers of the resurgent populism enabled by Trump’s victory and work wherever we can to counter it and the fascist narratives it promotes.
 
FAREED KHAN
Fareed Khan is the founder of Canadians United Against Hate and has written and commented extensively about issues around racism and human rights.  More by Fareed Khan.

© 2024 Rabble.ca.  This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
© 2024 The View From Here.  © 2024 Fareed Khan.  All Rights Reserved.


2019-09-15

By refusing to use the “fascist” label for Donald Trump and Boris Johnson British and American media are failing democracy in their respective nations

By Fareed Khan

When Adolf Hitler decided to enter Germany’s political arena he was a figure on the fringe of society with lunatic delusions of his place in history.  In the early stages of his political career, no respectable German who had any dealings with him (or his followers) took him seriously.

  
However, within a few short years Hitler and his followers had succeeded in dismantling the government and political institutions that stood in the way of his total reconstruction of the German state – an independent judiciary, the checks and balances of Germany's political structure, the intellectual class, progressive social and political forces, etc.  He took the control and security institutions of a democratic society and transformed them to serve his political agenda, and then merged them into a totalitarian entity that would go on to commit mass-murder on an unimaginable scale, and plunge the world into a war that would result in the death of tens of millions.

In the United States Donald Trump, before his entry into the political arena, was a gaudy and bombastic businessman, with multiple bankruptcies under his belt, a reputation as a womanizer, the front man for an inane reality TV show, and no real world political experience.  When he decided to seek the Republican Party's nomination for president few though he would be successful.  But his entry into the US presidential race shattered America’s political culture as he defeated his Republican rivals for the nomination and eventually went on to become president.  Since winning the presidency, he has proceeded to tear down the institutions, and the checks and balances, that hinder his personal and political ambitions, and in the process unleashed a political ugliness that threatens the democratic foundations of the US.

In the United Kingdom, Boris Johnson, a former newspaper reporter fired by The Times for forging quotes in a story he filed, was for a long time derided as a buffoon.  Critics and various journalists labeled him a “clown”, a “racist and bigot”, a “jester”, a “self-absorbed sociopath”, and a “serial liar.”  The public disrepute was so widespread that his own father, a former EU employee, went on a BBC show 10 years ago to defend him and claim, "my son is not a buffoon".  However, like Trump he went from one political success to another, eventually becoming prime minister of the UK.

Neither Trump nor Johnson ever cared about facts, principles, ideals or morals, because they got in the way of what these men wanted to achieve.  However, in their politics, they demonstrated the worst elements of modern fascist ideology.  Some of these included: 
*  protection and enhancement of the power and wealth of corporate / financial elites;
*  support for ethnic supremacy, nativism and ethno-nationalism;
*  disdain for civil liberties and human rights;
*  identifying "enemies" as a unifying cause;
*  contempt for fact-based policy and decision-making; and
*  tolerance of widespread racism, bigotry and misogyny.

RELATED:

Trump defeated Hillary Clinton – a seasoned (but widely disliked) opponent with a big war chest – and her Democratic Party's internally rigged election machine.  He then went on to reshape the right-wing Republican Party in his image, and stacked his cabinet with individuals bent on dismantling those laws and state institutions that stood in the way of them lining their own pockets, and protecting the interests of the public.

RELATED:

Johnson ousted from the mayorship of London, Ken Livingston – a seasoned and decent mayor and Labour politician.  To gain the leadership of the UK Conservative Party he knifed Prime Minister Teresa May in the back and then gave it a twist to secure the keys to 10 Downing Street.  Since taking power he has proceeded to use every legal executive power vested in the PM's office to hobble the Parliament that - at least in theory - represents "the will of the people".  Furthermore, Johnson appointed to his cabinet unscrupulous individuals who wear their elitism and depravity on their sleeves, and wage war against decency, religious "others" (particularly Muslims), ethnic non-Whites, immigrants and asylum seekers.

Scotland’s highest civil court in a unanimous decision ruled that Johnson acted "unlawfully" by misleading Queen Elizabeth to gain her assent in shutting down the UK Parliament to prevent Brexit opponents from attacking him in the House of Commons in the run up to the Brexit deadline.

Despite all of this, despite the mountains of evidence available, despite the destructive path they have put their nations on, despite the lessons of history from Nazi Germany, gullible voters have made these sociopaths leaders of their respective nations, and Western mass media have yet to label either of them as the fascists they are.

Regrettably for the masses, by the time corporate media and the journalists they employ wake up to the reality in front of them and recognize that both of these men are fascist in their politics, the new "gestapos" in US and UK will be knocking on the doors of their news outlets and paying midnight visits to journalists’ homes, preventing them from publishing their "Adolf Trump" or "Adolf Johnson" features!

What follows will be a repeat of history that will destroy lives and societies, a history that could be avoided if the "guardians of democracy" in the media only open their eyes to the truth before them and warn their publics of the dystopia towards which these two men are leading their nations.

With thanks to Prof. Maung Zarni for the foundation of this commentary.

© 2019 The View From Here.  © 2019 Fareed Khan.  All Rights Reserved.